Implementing Technology Policy as Higher Educational Teaching and Learning Tools

Living reference work entry



With the rapid development of technology in recent decades, it is a widely held view that the role of technology in the process of teaching and learning has become more and more crucial in higher education in Hong Kong. In 2001, UGC launched a review on higher education in Hong Kong and reported that technology is challenging us to acquire new skills to harness its powerful but demanding potential to enhance teaching and learning (Tung 1997). The need for staff in the sector to develop new skills to respond effectively to technological and other changes in higher education was also recommended. Therefore, the expectation of technology being adopted in higher education at all scales is very high realizing the demand in current situation as well as for future workforce (Blake 2013). Today, there are developed policies adopted in most higher education institutions having different...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Becker D (2013) Anticipating the exception, not the rule: forming policy for student use of technology in the classroom. eJ Educ Policy (Fall) ERIC Number: EJ1158557; ISSN: EISSN-2158-9232Google Scholar
  2. Blake RJ (2013) Brave new digital classroom: technology and foreign language learning. Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiu et al (2005) Usability, quality, value and E-learning continuance decisions. Comput Educ 45(1):399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummings P (2012, September 29) World wide ed. Saturday Age Good WeekendGoogle Scholar
  5. de Freitas S, Oliver M (2006) Does E-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. J High Educ Policy Manag 27(1):81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fatma GS, Nesrin OD (2015) Online collaboration tools in education: Google docs sample. Anthropologist 20(1,2):187–196Google Scholar
  7. Firoz A (2014) Using technology tools to innovate assessment, reporting, and teaching practices in engineering education. RMIT University, Australia. Engineering Science Reference, 386 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrison D, Cleveland IM, Fung T (2004) Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: model and instrument validation. JALN 8:61–69Google Scholar
  9. Giesecke M (2002) The myths of the information age. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
  10. Hmelo Silver CE, Bromme R (2007) Coding discussions and discussing coding: research on collaborative learning in computer-supported environments. Learn Instr 17(4):460–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jorge G (2006) Ruiz and Brian Hagenlocker, peer reviewing E-learning: opportunities. Am Med Assoc 8(6):381–386Google Scholar
  12. Kelly B (2004) Developing a holistic approach for E-learning accessibility. Can J Learn Technol. 3rd edn. 30 p 30Google Scholar
  13. Khan B (2005) E-learning quick checklist. Information ScienceGoogle Scholar
  14. Kirkup G, Kirkwood A (2007) Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching – a tale of gradualism rather than revolution. Learn Media Technol 30(2):185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  16. Kozma R (ed) (2003) Technology, innovation, and educational change: a global perspective. International Society for Technology in Education, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  17. Lian D, Shaofeng L (2010) Markup in engineering design: a discourse. Future Internet (Open Access), pp 74–95Google Scholar
  18. Mason R, Rennie F (2006) E-learning the key concepts. Routledge, London/New York, p 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelet JE (2014) E-Learning 2.0 technologies and web applications in higher education (KMCMS, IDRAC International School of Management, University of Nantes, France) and Panagiota Papadopoulou (University of Athens, Greece). Information Science, 325 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Tindell DR, Bohlander RW (2012) The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: a survey of college students. Coll Teach 60(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tung CH (1997) The 1997 policy address: building Hong Kong for a new era. Government Printer, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang YS (2007) Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Inf Manag 41:75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina