Pay for Performance in Government: The Case of South Korea

  • Yujin ChoiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3808-1

Synonyms

Definition

Pay for performance refers to a system of employee payment that links individual pay to measures of individual performance.

Introduction

This paper discusses the features of the pay for performance (PFP) system in the Korean government. With the New Public Management (NPM) initiative, governments worldwide have adopted innovative approaches from the private sector to enhance performance in the public sector. To survive the Asian financial crisis in 1997, South Korea (hereafter referred to as Korea) has also implemented various administrative reforms to increase competitiveness and reduce inefficiency in the public sector. As part of these efforts, the Korean government has implemented a wide range of performance-based management systems, including evaluation of government performance and personnel management.

Enhancing government performance requires improving the performance of individual officials. Before...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Choi Y (2017) Pay in government: present challenges and suggestions for the future. Korean Public Pers Adm Rev 16(1):75–102. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  2. Han S (2010) Responses of Civil Servants to Pay for Performance: An Application of Grounded Theory Korean Public Adm Rev 44(4):29–58. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  3. Hur C (2012) Institution, institutional process, and institutional effects: institutional process and institutional effects of performance-based pay. Korean Public Adm Rev 46(2):55–83. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  4. Kim P (2014) Performance appraisal and performance-related pay in government: the case of South Korea. Int J Civ Serv Reform Pract 2:11–31Google Scholar
  5. Kong D, Kim S, Yang S (2013) Individual performance appraisal in the government of Korea. Ministry of Strategy and Finance, SejongGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee S (2011) Mission impossible? Analysis on the gap between ideal conditions and actual conditions of pay-for-performance in the public sector. Korean Public Pers Adm Rev 10(3):75–102. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  7. Ministry of Personnel Management (MPM) (2019a) Guidelines on government employee performance evaluation. Ministry of Personnel Management, Sejong. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Personnel Management (MPM) (2019b) Guidelines on government employee compensation. Ministry of Personnel Management, Sejong. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  9. OECD (2005) Performance-related pay policies for government employees. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. OECD (2012) Public personnel administration in OECD countries. OECD, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  11. Oh S (2013) Public personnel administration in Korea. Parkyoungsa, Seoul. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar
  12. Yu M, Park S (2014) Public personnel administration in Korea. Parkyoungsa, Seoul. [Written in Korean]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationEwha Womans UniversitySeoulSouth Korea