Skip to main content

Civil Service Reform and Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 125 Accesses

Synonyms

Civil services; Ethics; HR reforms; Public administration reform

Definition

Evaluation of how morality and ethics are represented in the discourse about the reform of human resource management and in the context of new governance reforms

Introduction

Public administration and public HR policies are constituent parts of the system of government. As history shows, countries may survive without government but not without public administration. Until today, no government has completely privatized the delivery of public tasks, no public administration works like a private company, and no public HR systems have been totally aligned to private sector practices.

Despite its many specific features and importance for millions of people, the nature of public administrations and HR policies are not well known to the wider public. Moreover, public administration and HR policies as such rarely enjoy a high reputation. At best, public administration reform is an interesting subject for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bazerman MH, Tenbrunsel AE (2011) Blind spots. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bekke HAGM, van der Meer FM (eds) (2001) Civil service systems in Western Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezes P, Jeannot G (2018) Autonomy and managerial reforms in Europe: let or make public managers manage? Public Adm 96:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham T (2011) The Rule of Law. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens M, Wille A (2009) Diploma democracy – on the tensions between meritocracy and democracy. Universiteit Utrecht/Universiteit Leiden, Utrecht/Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JS, West JP (2008) “Removing employee protection: a “see no evil” approach to civil service reform”. In: Leo WJC, Huberts/Jeroen Maesschalck/Carole L. Jurkiewicz, Ethics and Integrity of Governance. Perspective across frontiers (Massachussetts: Elgar)

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd JW, Scoville JG (2005) The ethics of human resources and industrial relations. ILR Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TL (2006) The responsible administrator, 5th edn. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlström C, Lapuente V (2018) Organizing Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlström C, Lapuente V, Teorell J (2012) The merit of meritocratization: politics, bureaucracy, and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Polit Res Q 65(3):656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf G, van der Wal (2008) Z., On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Admin Soc 40(1):79–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dench G (ed) (2006) The rise and rise of meritocracy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2009) Working conditions in the European Union, work organisation. Eurofound, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2018) Identity. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard J (2014) The psychologisation of employment relations? Hum Resour Manag J 24:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood M (2013) Ethical analysis of HRM: a review and research agenda. J Bus Ethics 114:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest D (2012) Employee engagement: a sceptical analysis. J Organ Eff People Perform 1(2):141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberts L (2014) The integrity of governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karam EP et al (2019) Illuminating the “Face” of justice: a meta-analytic examination of leadership and organizational justice. J Manag Stud 56:1. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecky P, Meyer-Sahling J, Panizza F, Schuster G, Spirova M (2016) Party patronage in contemporary democracies: results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions. Eur J Polit Res 55(2):416–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom CE (1959) The Science of Muddling through, In Public Administration Review, 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R (1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. Am Sociol Rev 1(6):896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling J, Mikkelsen K (2016) Civil service, merit, politicization, and corruption: the perspective of public officials from five East European Countries. Public Adm 94(4):1105–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina C, Cropanzano R, Martinez-Tur V (2017) Organizational justice. Routledge, New York, pp 137–160

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mungiu-Pippidi A (2016) The quest for good governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017a) Skills for a high performing civil service. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017b) Governance at a glance. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017c) Skills for a High Performing Civil Service. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Behavioural insights for public integrity. OECD, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paine LS (2000) Does ethics pay? Bus Ethics Q 10(1):319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker Follett M (1926) The Giving of Orders, Scientific foundations of business administration, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Pierre J (eds) (2003) Handbook of public administration, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Pierre J (2016) Comparative Governance, Cambridge: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnington A, Macklin R, Campbell T (eds) (2007) Human Resource Management, Ethics and Employment. Oxford: Oxford: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell J (2012) The limits and possibilities of employee engagement, Warwick papers in industrial relations, vol 96. University of Warwick, Warwick

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell J (2014) Disengaging from engagement. Hum Resour Manag J 24(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raadschelders J, Toonen T, Van der Meer F (2015) Civil servants in the enabling framework state of the 21st century. In: Van der Meer F, Raadschelders J, Toonen T (eds) Comparative civil service systems in the 21st century, 2nd edn. Palgrave MacMillann, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch J, Evans P (2000) Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. J Public Econ 75:49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1973) Public Administration. New York: Alfred Knopf

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DF (1985) The possibility of administrative ethics. Public Adm Rev 45(5):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P (2011) The trouble with HRM. Hum Resour Manag J 21(4):363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal Z, Huberts L, Van den Heuvel H, Kolthoff E (2007) Central values of government and business: differences, similarities, and conflicts. Public Adm Q 30(3):314–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Vie OE (2010) Have post-bureaucratic changes occurred in managerial work? Eur Manag J 28:182–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Demmke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Demmke, C. (2019). Civil Service Reform and Ethics. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3734-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3734-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics