Utility and Consumer Behavior Theory

  • Suwastika Naidu
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3693-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Consumer Behavior Theory: These theories consider a range of factors that influence the choices of the consumers.

Intrinsic Properties: These are the internal properties of the object.

Neoclassical Microeconomics: This is the branch of economics that examines consumer utility.

Introduction

Economic theories on consumer behavior have always fascinated microeconomists and policy makers. Understanding the way consumers behave is a challenging task as each consumer has unique characteristics and they respond differently to different situations (Bovi 2009). Economists have used different approaches to explain consumer behavior. The main aim of Samuelson’s (1938) study was to examine utility as a psychological construct, while analyzing issues related to the marginal rate of substitution and how consumers behave to with changes in price. Samuelson (1938) extended Georgescu-Roegen’s (1936) study of the pure theory of consumer...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Becchetti L, Solferino N, Tessitore ME (2016) Education not for money: an economic analysis on education, civic engagement and life satisfaction. Theor Econom Lett 6(01):39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumkin T, Ruffle BJ, Ganun Y (2012) Are income and consumption taxes ever really equivalent? Evidence from a real-effort experiment with real goods. Eur Econ Rev 56(6):1200–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovi M (2009) Economic versus psychological forecasting. Evidence from consumer confidence surveys. J Econ Psychol 30(4):563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown TM (1952) Habit persistence and lags in consumer behaviour. Econometrica 20(3):355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debreu G (1959) Theory of value, Cowles foundation monograph. University of Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Debreu G (1960) Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Suppes P (eds) Mathematical methods in the social sciences. California University Press, Stanford, pp 50–76Google Scholar
  7. Donnea FX (1972) Consumer behaviour, transport mode choice and value of time: some micro-economic models. Regional Urban Econom 1(4):355–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holländer H (2001) On the validity of utility statements: standard theory versus Duesenberry’s. J Econ Behav Organ 45(3):227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson WE (1913) The pure theory of utility curves. Econ J 23(92):483–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lancaster KJ (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2):132–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morishima M (1959) The problem of intrinsic complementarity and separability of goods. Metroeconomica 11(3):188–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pareto V (1897) The new theories of economics. J Polit Econ 5(4):485–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pareto V, Sensini G (1906) Applicazioni della matematica all'economia politica. Giornale degli Economisti 33(1):424–453Google Scholar
  14. Park HY, Rha JY, Widdows R (2011) Toward a digital goods consumer competence index: an exploratory study. Fam Consum Sci Res J 40(2):184–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Samuelson PA (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica 5(17):61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Slutsky EE (1915) On the theory of the budget of the consumer. Giornale degli Economisti 51(1):1–26Google Scholar
  17. Smith A (1776) Wealth of nations. Methuen & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the South PacificSuvaFiji Islands