Discovery Leadership for Corporate Responsibility

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3593-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Associative mindset

The recognition of the symbiotic relationship between business and society and the values at stake.

Business and society field

An academic area of inquiry into the role of business organizations in society.

Corporate social responsibility

An area of business and society research that addresses the obligations that firms have to society.

Corporate social responsiveness

An area of business and society research that examines the processes by which managers can discern and respond to stakeholder expectations of business responsibilities.

Corporate social performance

An area of business and society research that examines the outcomes or impacts of corporate conduct.

Discovery leadership

A theoretical perspective on the type of executive capable of activating the personal and organizational values that enable a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 4:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins D (1988) Adam Smith’s social contract: the proper role of individual liberty and government intervention in the 18th century. Bus Prof Ethics J 7:120–146Google Scholar
  3. Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Frederick WC (1995) Values, nature, and culture in the American corporation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman/Ballinger, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2012) A new phase: the growth of sustainability reporting – GRI’s year in review. GRI, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldberg LR (1993) The structure of phenotypic personality traits. Am Psychol 48:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Orlitzky M, Swanson DL, Quartermaine LK (2006) Normative myopia, executives’ personality, and preference for pay dispersion: toward implications for corporate social performance. Business & Society 45:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Savitz A (2013) Talent, transformation, and the triple bottom line. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. Schein EH (1985) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swanson DL (1996) Neoclassical economic theory, executive control, and organizational outcomes. Human Relations 49:735–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Swanson DL (1999) Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Acad Manag Rev 24:506–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Swanson DL (2008) Top managers as drivers for corporate social responsibility. In: Crane A, McWilliams A, Matten D, Moon J, Siegel D (eds) The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  18. Swanson DL (2014) Embedding CSR into corporate culture: challenging the executive mind. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swanson DL (2017) The restorative potential of discovery leadership: corporate responsibility as participating consciousness. In: Giacalone R, Jurkiewicz CL (eds) Radical thoughts on ethical leadership. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 69–95Google Scholar
  20. Swanson DL (2018) CSR discovery leadership: society, science, and shared value consciousness. Palgrave Macmillan/Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Treviño LK, Nelson KA (2004) Managing business ethics: straight talk about how to do it right. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddock S (2009) Leading corporate citizens: vision, values, value added. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wood D (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manag Rev 16:691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business Administration, Kansas State UniversityManhattanUSA