Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance pp 1–7Cite as

Comparative Information Management in Australia and Vietnam: The Case of Gov 2.0

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 92 Accesses

Introduction

Information is an important national resource which provides the public with knowledge of government, society, and the economy (McDermott 2010). Information Governance (IG) refers to establishing an environment and opportunities, rules, and decision-making rights for the valuation, creation, collection, analysis, distribution, storage, use, and control of information; it answers the question “what information do we need, how do we make use of it and who is responsible for it?” (Kooper et al. 2011, p. 196). On the other hand, Information Management (IM) concerns the control over how information is created, acquired, organized, stored, distributed, and used as a means of promoting efficient and effective information access, processing, and use by people and organizations (Lin 2011, p. 284).

This entry compares IG and IM between Australia and Vietnam through the reflection of a theoretical unified IGIM framework proposed by Nguyen et al. (2014) in government information...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Baltzan P, Lynch K, Blakey P (2013) Business driven information systems, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education - Europe, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Hansen D (2012) The impact of policies on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov Inf Q 29(1):30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies P (2013) Business information systems, 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsón E, Torres L, Royo S, Flores F (2012) Local e-government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Gov Inf Q 29(2012):123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun SA, Shulman S, Sandoval R, Hovy E (2010) Government 2.0: making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity 15(1–2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook J, Pachler N (2012) Online people tagging: social (mobile) network(ing) services and work-based learning. Br J Educ Technol 43(5):711–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi Y, Williams M, Amit M, Niranjan S, Vishanth W (2011) Understanding advances in web technologies: evolution from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0. Paper presented at the ECIS 2011 Proceedings. Paper 257

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria FDA, Maçada ACG, Kumar K (2013) Information governance in the banking industry. Paper presented at the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 7–10, Wailea

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen N (2009) Engage: getting on with Government 2.0. Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce. from Australian Government Information Management Office. https://www.finance.gov.au/files/2012/05/Government20TaskforceReport.pdf

  • Hung S-Y, Chang C-M, Kuo S-R (2013) User acceptance of mobile e-government services: an empirical study. Gov Inf Q 30(2013):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger PT, Bertot JC, Shuler JA (2010) The Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), academic libraries, and access to government information. J Acad Librariansh 36(6):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp S (2015) Internet statistics in Vietnam 2015 including Social media and Mobile. Retrieved 20 Dec 2015, http://chabrol.net/2015/06/09/internet-statistics-in-vietnam-2015/

  • Kooper MN, Maes R, Lindgreen R (2011) On the governance of information: introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information. Int J Inf Manag 31:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajara TT, Maçada ACG (2013) Information governance framework: the defense manufacturing case study. Paper presented at the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 15–17, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin XC (2011) Three perspectives of information management. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, Nov 26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott P (2010) Building open government. Gov Inf Q 27(4):401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeen JD, Smith HA (2007) Developments in practice XXIV: information management: the nexus of business and IT. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 19(3):34–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan J (2013) Information Management and Privacy in the Public Sector. Retrieved 20 March 2015, from Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. http://www.oaic.gov.au/news-and-events/speeches/information-policy-speeches/information-management-and-privacy-in-the-public-sector

  • Ministry of Home Affairs (2014) Circular No. 14/2014 /TT-BNV on standards and requirements of public servants for information/records management. SRADV, Vietnam

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody D, Walsh P (1999) Measuring the value of information: an asset valuation approach. Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS’99), 23–25 June, Frederiksberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutula S, Wamukoy JM (2009) Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government. Int J Inf Manag 29(5):333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (2004) Recordkeeping and online security processes: guidelines for managing commonwealth records created or received using authentication or encryption. National Archives of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (2011) Implementing an EDRMS – Checklist. Australia: Asutralian Government

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (2014) Digital information and records management capabilities. Australia: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.naa.gov.au/naaresources/documents/capability-matrix.pdf

  • National Archives of Australia (2015a) Information and records management strategy – template from NAA http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/strategic-information/information-governance/key-documents/strategy.aspx

  • National Archives of Australia (2015b) Qualifications, skills and knowledge. Retrieved 15 June 2015, http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/development/qualifications/index.aspx

  • National Archives of Australia (2015c) Records management and the cloud – a checklist. Australia: Australian government (accessed 2015) Retrieved from http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/publications/cloud-checklist.aspx

  • Nguyen C, Sargent J, Stockdale R, Scheepers H (2014) Towards a unified framework for governance and management of information. Paper presented at the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 8–10th Dec 2014, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • OAIC (2014) Australian privacy principles. Australian Government, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister (2012) Directive No. 15/CT-TTg on the increased use of electronic records in the operation of state agencies. Vietnam: State Records and Archives Department of Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov.vn/content/law/Pages/View.aspx?DocumentID=1089

  • Silic M, Back A (2013) Factors impacting information governance in the mobile device dual-use context. Rec Manag J 23(2):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • SRADV (2015) List of standards related to records management. Retrieved 20 Arpril 2015, from State Records and Archives Department of Vietnam. http://www.archives.gov.vn/content/law/Pages/Default.aspx?CategoriesID=6

  • United Nations (2014) E-Government survey 2014. Retrieved 20 Mar 2015. http://unpan3.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2014-Survey/E-Gov_Complete_Survey-2014.pdf

  • Veljković N, Bogdanović-Dinić S, Stoimenov L (2012) Building e-Government 2.0 – a step forward in bringing government closer to citizens'. J e-Govern Studies Best Pract 18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science and Technology Center, State Records and Archives Department of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Chinh Nguyen

  2. Swinburne Business School, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Helana Scheepers, Jason Sargent & Rosemary Stockdale

Authors
  1. Chinh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helana Scheepers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason Sargent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rosemary Stockdale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinh Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nguyen, C., Scheepers, H., Sargent, J., Stockdale, R. (2018). Comparative Information Management in Australia and Vietnam: The Case of Gov 2.0. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3490-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3490-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation