Social Network Theory

  • Marla A. ParkerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2765-1

Synonym

Definition

Structural dimensions of interpersonal or interorganizational relationships that drive the development of the social capital connected to the development and implementation of public mission and policy.

Introduction

Social network theory describes how the various dimensions comprising the content and structure of socially connected entities interact. Additionally, the various concepts within the larger realm of social network theory explain how various outcomes result from the social capital (i.e., resources emerging from relationships) generated among a body of connections. More specifically, social network theory provides very useful insights into how the creation, changes, and flow of various resources depend upon the pathways among connections, which can have positive and negative impacts. In the context of public administration, public policy, and governance, social network theory provides a useful lens for understanding key activities such as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agranoff R (2006) Inside collaborative networks: ten lessons for public managers. Public Adm Rev 66(s1):56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burt RS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Res Organ Behav 22:345–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Meier KJ, O’Toole LJ Jr (2001) Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: a model with evidence from US public education. J Public Adm Res Theory 11(3):271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. O’Leary R, Bingham LB (eds) (2009) The collaborative public manager: new ideas for the twenty-first century. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Portes A (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol 24(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Provan KG, Kenis P (2008) Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Adm Res Theory 18(2):229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceCalifornia State University-Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA