Immigration Policy

  • Christopher L. AtkinsonEmail author
Living reference work entry



Immigration policy in the European Union (EU) has been characterized by a tension between Europeanization and free-flow of citizens on one hand and the difficult internal context of member-states, informed by political realities and the identities of the nations themselves. This may be understood as led by elite discourse, which may be ineffective in accomplishing goals that serve the needs of at-risk migrants and asylum-seekers.


EU pressure upon member states in areas of immigration policy and its reform has found a strong offset in in-state policy considerations. Policy has stressed stronger external borders, yielding approaches that favor military and security measures (Butler 2018), migration within the EU as a security matter, and regulatory factors that observe “pull” of certain nations for migrants. The intent for Europeanization, “attributed to European integration” (Costello 2006, p....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Abou-Chadi T (2016) Political and institutional determinants of immigration policies. J Ethn Migr Stud 42(13):2087–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson CL (forthcoming) By soil, blood, and administration: A narrative analysis of German immigration law. In Atkinson CL (ed) Semiotic Analysis and Public Policy: Connecting Theory and Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bove A (2014) For whose benefit? Fear and loathing in the welfare state. J Polit Market 13:108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler G (2018) Legal responses to the European Union’s migration crisis. San Diego Int’l LJ 19:277–310Google Scholar
  5. Cerna L (2018) The crisis as an opportunity for change? High-skilled immigration policies across Europe. J Ethn Migr Stud 42(10):1610–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comte E (2018) The history of the European migration regime: Germany’s strategic hegemony. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  7. Costello C (2006) Administrative governance and the Europeanisation of asylum and immigration policy. In: Hofmann HCH, Turk AH (eds) EU administrative governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 287–340Google Scholar
  8. Dunleavy P, O’Leary B (1987) Theories of the state: the politics of liberal democracy. New Amsterdam, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farazmand A (1999) The elite question: toward a normative elite theory of organization. Adm Soc 31(3):321–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford R, Jennings W, Somerville W (2015) Public opinion, responsiveness and constraint: Britain’s three immigration policy regimes. J Ethn Migr Stud 41(9):1391–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia-Zamora J (2018) Ethical dilemmas of migration: moral challenges for policymakers. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garvey JI (2018) The future legal management of mass migration. Int Lawyer 51(2):121–169Google Scholar
  13. Guérin N (2018) One wave of reforms, many outputs: the diffusion of European asylum policies beyond Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 25(7):1068–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hampshire J (2016) European migration governance since the Lisbon treaty: introduction to the special issue. J Ethn Migr Stud 42(4):537–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatton TJ (2015) Asylum policy in the EU: the case for deeper integration. CESifo Econ Stud 61(3):605–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hegel GWF (1977, orig. 1807) Phenomenology of spirit (trans: Miller AV). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Jay M (2004) Is experience still in crisis? Reflections on a Frankfurt school lament. In: Huhn T (ed) The Cambridge companion to Adorno. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strumia F (2016) European citizenship and EU immigration: a demoi-cratic bridge between the third country nationals’ right to belong and the member states’ power to exclude. Eur Law J 22(4):417–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thielemann E, Schade D (2016) Buying into myths: free movement of people and immigration. Polit Q 87(2):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thurlow C, Jaworski A (2017) Introducing elite discourse: the rhetorics of status, privilege, and power. Soc Semiot 27(3):243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vaughan-Williams N (2015) Europe’s border crisis: biopolitical security and beyond. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Administration & LawUniversity of West FloridaPensacolaUSA