Public Policy and Instrumentalism
Instrumentalism in public policy invokes a means-ends course of action, often based in administrative process and technique, which deliberately defines public problems and their solutions with a mind toward achieving a favored societal goal (Rochefort and Cobb 1994). This emphasizes “the connection of (scientific) rationality to the conduct of life itself…the methodological attainment of a definitely given and practical end by the use of increasingly precise calculation of…means” (Adorno, quoted in Held 1980, p. 65).
This work explores public policy and instrumentalism, with a focus on implications for public administration. First, the notion of instrumentalism in the public policy context is discussed. Next, instrumental reasoning is reviewed as a basis for language games, and obscuring of the purpose and intent of policy; ramifications for public service and its obligations are...
- Farazmand A (2002) Organization theory: from pre-classical to contemporary and critical theories – an overview and appraisal. In: Farazmand A (ed) Modern organizations: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Praeger, Westport, pp 19–62Google Scholar
- Held D (1980) Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Horkheimer M (1974) Critique of instrumental reasoning. Seabury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jun JS (2006) The social construction of public administration: Interpretive and critical perspectives. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Quirk MJ (2000) Dewey’s version of pragmatism. Retrieved from http://www.sophia-project.org/uploads/1/3/9/5/13955288/quirk_dewey1.pdf
- Rochefort DA, Cobb RW (1994) Problem definition: an emerging perspective. In: Rochefort DA, Cobb RW (eds) The politics of problem definition: shaping the policy agenda. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, pp 1–31Google Scholar
- Stehr N, Ruser A (2017) Social scientists as technicians, advisors and meaning producers. Innovation 30(1):24–35Google Scholar
- van der Meulen DH (2013) The use of impact assessments and the quality of legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1(2):305–325Google Scholar
- Van Detta JA (2004) The irony of instrumentalism: Using Dworkin's principle-rule distinction to reconceptualize metaphorically a substance-procedure dissonance exemplified by forum non conveniens dismissals in international product injury cases. Marquette Law Review 87(3):425–523Google Scholar
- Wellmer A (1974) Critical theory of society. Seabury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar