Ocular malformations are numerous: some are already evident at birth or during the first few months of life, while others show themselves at a later stage.
Ocular malformations can be a sign of more complex and general pathologies, and the importance of early recognition should not be underestimated for those which can cause a damage to the vision and/or amblyopia (interruption of the development of the visual function).
Ocular malformations of the anterior segment are easily recognizable during examination, the ones of the posterior segment either are associated with the former or, more frequently, have as first symptom a constant or intermittent strabismus.
Differences in size, asymmetry, opening, and color between the two eyes should never be underestimated as they could be a sign of possible malformations.
The pediatrician is crucial and can help in a timely diagnosis of congenital eye pathologies and will recommend that the patient sees a specialist for further examination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Allen CE, Rubin PA (2008 Spring) Blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome (BPES): clinical manifestation and treatment. Int Ophthalmol Clin 48(2):15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics (2008) Reflex examination in neonates, infants, and children. Pediatrics 122:1401–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroody M, Holds JB, Vick VL (2005) Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of ptosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 16:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauser L, Tieghi R, Galiè M (2006) Palpebral ptosis: clinical classification, differential diagnosis, and surgical guidelines: an overview. J Craniofac Surg 17:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faiq M, Sharma R, Dada R, Mohanty K, Saluja D, Dada T (2013) Biochemical and clinical insights into primary congenital glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 7(2):66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzola R, Piozzi E, Lanfranchi AL, Baruffaldi Preis FW (2011) Congenital ptosis and blefarophimosis: retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of correction with levator resection and frontalis suspension. Pediatr Med Chir 33(3):129–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim JW, Lee H et al (2013) Amblyopia risk factors in infants with congenital naso-lacrimal duct obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 24(4):1123–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraker JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (2005) Cornea: fundamentals, diagnosis and management, 2nd edn. Elsevier Mosby, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
Lee H (2010) Complication and visual prognosis in children with aniridia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 47:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci B (2006) Oftalmologia Pediatrica. Trattati Mattioli, RomaGoogle Scholar
Schittkowski MP, Guthoff RF (2010) Systemic and ophthalmological anomalies in congenital anophthalmic or microphthalmic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 94:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiple D, Finklea B, Lauderdale JD, Netland PA (2015) Keratopathy, cataract, and dry eye in a survey of aniridia subjects. Clin Ophthalmol 9:291–295 . Published online 2015 February 10PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Tawfik HA, Abdulhafez MH, Fouad YA (2015) Congenital upper eyelid coloboma: embryologic, nomenclatorial, nosologic, etiologic, pathogenetic, epidemiologic, clinical, and management perspectives. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 31(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor D (1990) Pediatric ophthalmology, 1st edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
Uhumwangho OM, Jalali S (2014) Chorioretinal coloboma in a paediatric population. Eye (Lond) 28(6):728–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar