Neonatology pp 2315-2322 | Cite as

Epidemiology of Adverse Cerebral Outcome of Newborns

  • Neil MarlowEmail author
Reference work entry


Continuing improvement in perinatal and neonatal care has emphasized the importance of adverse childhood outcomes as the most important sequelae of care. Major disabling conditions such as cerebral palsy are related to the occurrence of brain injury and appear to be reducing in prevalence and severity among the very preterm group. However, the most common problems found after preterm birth relate to intellectual disability, defined in early childhood as low developmental test scores. Severe visual and hearing impairments are much less prevalent but nonetheless important impairments. In this chapter I will discuss time trends in outcomes and short-term prevalences up to 3 years of age.


  1. Bodeau-Livinec F, Ancel P, Marlow N et al (2007) Care and early childhood outcome of extremely preterm infants in the British Isles and in France. Am J Epidemiol 165(11):S19–S19Google Scholar
  2. BOOST-II Australia Group et al (2016) Outcomes of two trials of oxygen-saturation targets in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 374(8):749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BOOST-II UK Group et al (2013) Oxygen saturation and outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 368(22):2094–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Himmelmann K, Hagberg G, Beckung E et al (2005) The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. IX. Prevalence and origin in the birth-year period 1995–1998. Acta Paediatr 94(3):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jarvis S, Glinianaia SV, Blair E (2006) Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth. Clin Perinatol 33(2):285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerr-Wilson CO, Mackay DF, Smith GC et al (2012) Meta-analysis of the association between preterm delivery and intelligence. J Public Health 34(2):209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krageloh-Mann I, Cans C (2009) Cerebral palsy update. [Review] [47 refs]. Brain Dev 31(7):537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A et al (2015) 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. LancetGoogle Scholar
  9. MacKay DF, Smith GC, Dobbie R et al (2010) Gestational age at delivery and special educational need: retrospective cohort study of 407,503 schoolchildren. PLoS Med 7(6), e1000289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marlow N (2007) Neurodevelopmental follow-up – what tests, when and why. Acta Paediatr 96:242–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marlow N (2014) Interpreting regional differences in neonatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies. Acta Paediatr 103(1):4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA et al (2005) Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 352(1):9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marlow N, Bennett C, Draper ES et al (2014) Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 99(3):F181–F188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathiasen R, Hansen BM, Andersen AM et al (2010) Gestational age and basic school achievements: a national follow-up study in Denmark. Pediatrics 126(6):e1553–e1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J et al (2012) Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ 345, e7961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morsing E, Asard M, Ley D et al (2011) Cognitive function after intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. Pediatrics 127(4):e874–e882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pharoah PO, Cooke T, Rosenbloom I et al (1987) Trends in birth prevalence of cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child 62(4):379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Report of a BAPM/RCPCH Working Group (2008) Classification of Health Status at 2 years as a perinatal outcome. BAPM, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF et al (2015) Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 372(19):1801–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sellier E, Platt MJ, Andersen GL et al (2016) Decreasing prevalence in cerebral palsy: a multi-site European population-based study, 1980 to 2003. Dev Med Child Neurol 58(1):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serenius F, Sjors G, Blennow M et al (2014) EXPRESS study shows significant regional differences in 1-year outcome of extremely preterm infants in Sweden. Acta Paediatr 103(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stewart AL, Reynolds EO, Lipscomb AP (1981) Outcome for infants of very low birthweight: survey of world literature. Lancet 1(8228):1038–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Surman G, Hemming K, Platt MJ et al (2009) Children with cerebral palsy: severity and trends over time. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 23(6):513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tin W, Wariyar UK, Hey EN (1997) Selection biases invalidate current low birthweight weight-for-gestation standards. The Northern Neonatal Network. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(2):180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watson SI, Arulampalam W, Petrou S et al (2014) The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 4(7), e004856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolke D, Sohne B, Ohrt B et al (1995) Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet 345(8947):447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolke D, Schulz J, Meyer R (2001) Entwicklungslangzeitfolgen bei ehemaligen, sehr unreifen Frühgeborenen. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 149(Suppl 1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K et al (2000) Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med 343(6):378–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Women’s HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations