Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Personality Assessment

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

  • 707 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alea, N. (2018). Does the life story interview make us make sense? Spontaneous and cued redemption and contamination in life story scenes. Imagination, Cognition & Personality, 37, 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, N., & Wood, R. E. (2017). Dynamic personality science. Integrating between-person stability and within-person change. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boag, S. (2015). Personality assessment, ‘construct validity’, and the significance of theory. Personality & Individual Differences, 84, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boag, S. (2018a). Australian personality psychology: Past, present, and future prospects. Australian Journal of Psychology. Online preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag, S. (2018b). Personality dynamics, motivation, and the logic of explanation. Review of General Psychology, 22, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board of Trustees of the Society for Personality Assessment. (2005). The status of the Rorschach in clinical and forensic practice: An official statement by the Board of Trustees of the Society for Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D. (2004). The architecture of personality. Psychological Review, 111, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, A. O., Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., Kendler, K. S., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, 414–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Schneider, D. (2014). The impact of applicant faking on selection measures, hiring decisions, and employee performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (1974). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? – Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(8), 773–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B., Barrett, P., & Eysenck, H. J. (1984). Eysenck personality questionnaire-revised. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W. (2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, M. K., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 969–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S. E., 4–5. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganellen, R. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormal personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göb, R., McCollin, C., & Ramalhoto, M. F. (2007). Ordinal methodology in the analysis of Likert scales. Quality & Quantity, 41, 601–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012). Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: A quantitative review of taxometric research. Psychological Medicine, 42, 903–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. E. (2008). Item formats and social desirability in personality assessment: A review of the place of forced-choice items. In S. Boag (Ed.), Personality down under: Perspectives from Australia (pp. 39–50). New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddy, L., Billig, J., Bracciodieta, J., Hoeffler, L., Moynihan, P. J., & Pugliani, P. (1997). The effect of interviewer gender on the survey response. Political Behavior, 19, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13, 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayes, D. C. (2005). Internal validity and reliability of Kolb’s learning style inventory version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2008). The life story interview. Evanston: Northwestern University. http://www.urbanlab.org/articles/McAdams_2008_LifeStoryInterview.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. Daklofske (Eds.), Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273–294). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2005). The logic of measurement: A realist overview. Measurement, 38, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, W. G. (1995). Origin and history of the thematic apperception test images. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Kosinski, M., … Seligman, M. E. (2015). Automatic personality assessment through social media language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 934–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petocz, A., & Newbery, G. (2010). On conceptual analysis as the primary qualitative approach to statistics education research in psychology. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widiger, T. A., & Samuel, D. B. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17, 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s Alpha, Revelle’s Beta, McDonald’s Omega: Their relations with each and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia

    Simon Boag

Authors
  1. Simon Boag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Boag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

  2. Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Boag, S. (2019). Personality Assessment. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_837-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_837-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation