Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Contempt

  • Roberta A. SchriberEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_497-1

Synonyms

Definition

Contempt is characterized by looking down on, feeling cold toward, and having the tendency to distance or derogate a person or group perceived to violate important standards.

Introduction

Contempt is an affective phenomenon that is increasingly understood to powerfully shape behavior. First, a backdrop for contempt is offered by describing the first major research findings on contempt. Second, contempt as an emotional reaction is considered. Third, emerging work on dispositional contempt – or contempt at the personality level – is reviewed. Finally, attention turns to outstanding questions about contempt.

Contempt

First Findings on Contempt

The first major research findings on contempt in some way involved its expression. Building on Darwin’s (1872/1998) account of contempt as universally expressed, Ekman and Friesen (1986) identified the “unilateral lip curl,” or one-sided lip tightening, as its pancultural signal. Although studies addressing this...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Darwin, C. (1998). In P. Ekman (Ed.), The expression of emotions in man and animals (3rd, ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872).Google Scholar
  2. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 10, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischer, A., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016). Contempt: Derogating others while keeping calm. Emotion Review, 8, 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, A. H., & Roseman, I. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gervais, M. M., & Fessler, D. M. (2016). On the deep structure of social affect: Attitudes, emotions, sentiments, and the case of “contempt”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–77.Google Scholar
  7. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital process and marital outcomes. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). What predicts change in marital interaction over time? A study of alternative models. Family Process, 38, 143–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Izard, C. E., Libero, D. Z., Putnam, P., & Haynes, O. M. (1993). Stability of emotion experiences and their relations to traits of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 847–860.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Melwani, S., & Barsade, S. G. (2011). Held in contempt: The psychological, interpersonal, and performance consequences of contempt in a work context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 503–520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Melwani, S., Mueller, J. S., & Overbeck, J. R. (2012). Looking down: The influence of contempt and compassion on emergent leadership categorizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1171–1185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Roseman, I. J. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review, 3, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Russell, J. A. (1991). Negative results on a reported facial expression of contempt. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schriber, R. A., Chung, J. M., Sorensen, K. S., & Robins, R. W. (2017). Dispositional contempt: A first look at the contemptuous person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 280–309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Southard, A. C., Noser, A. E., Pollock, N. C., Mercer, S. H., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). The interpersonal nature of dark personality features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34, 555–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steiger, R. L., & Reyna, C. (2017). Trait contempt, anger, disgust, and moral foundation values. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ufkes, E. G., Otten, S., van der Zee, K. I., Giebels, E., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in “day-to-day” conflicts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Mind and BrainUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Monika Wróbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of LodzLodzPoland