Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Personality Processes

  • Stefanie Lindner
  • Damaris Aschwanden
  • Mathias Allemand
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_467-1

Synonyms

Definition

A personality process is “a series of steps (elements, components, and actions) through which some phenomenon takes place or emerges” (Baumert et al. 2017, p. 27). Personality processes differ with respect to several features including function, course, duration, awareness, and person-situation interactions.

Conceptualizing Personality Processes

A process is a time series of steps (i.e., actions, changes, or functions) resulting in an outcome (Baumert et al. 2017). Likewise, a personality process is a time series of thinking, feeling, and behaving that leads to an outcome. Process-oriented research in personality science investigates the dynamic unfolding of momentary thinking, feeling, and behaving in concrete situations (i.e., states) as well as broad and enduring tendencies in thinking, feeling, and behaving across situations (i.e., traits).

Personality processes can be...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., Perugini, M., Johnson, W., Blum, G., Borkenau, P., … Wrzus, C. (2017). Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. European Journal of Personality, 31, 503–528.  https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E. (2015). Whole trait theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 82–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nav, C. S., Sherman, R. A., … Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037250.
  8. Roberts, B. W. (2018). A revised sociogenomic model of personality traits. Journal of Personality, 86, 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Roberts, B. W., & Jackson, J. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00530.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Lindner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Damaris Aschwanden
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mathias Allemand
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.University Research Priority Program (URPP) “Dynamics of Healthy Aging”University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Anna Czarna
    • 1
  1. 1.Jagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland