Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Current Versus Future Reproduction Trade-Offs

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1620-1

Synonyms

Definition

Current versus future reproduction trade-offs are derived from life history theory and refer to the differential costs and benefits associated with reproducing now at an expense to future reproduction or reproducing later at an opportunity cost to present fertility.

Introduction

Life history theory provides the theoretical underpinning for considering the trade-offs in current versus future reproductive strategies. Natural and sexual selection have shaped life history patterns of individuals in particular contexts that directly affect their reproductive physiology such as age of sexual maturation and rate of reproductive senescence, in addition to their fitness-influencing behaviors such as age of first reproduction, number of offspring, and parental investment decisions (Figueredo et al. 2006). In biology, it is widely believed that fertility and mortality trade-off against...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Charnov, E. L. (1993). Life history invariants: Some explorations of symmetry in evolutionary ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 88–114). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Figueredo, A. J., Vasquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I., et al. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2007). The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Human Nature, 18(1), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jasienska, G. (2009). Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. American Journal of Human Biology, 21(4), 524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaplan, H., Lancaster, J., & Robson, A. (2003). Embodied capital and the evolutionary economics of the human life span. Population and Development Review, 29, 152–182.Google Scholar
  8. Snopkowski, K., & Kaplan, H. (2014). A synthetic biosocial model of fertility transition: Testing the relative contribution of embodied capital theory, changing cultural norms, and women's labor force participation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 154(3), 322–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Glenn Scheyd
    • 1
  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA