Skip to main content

Competition

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Synonyms

Competitive reward structure; Competitiveness

Definition

Competition is defined in psychology as a social situation in which individuals believe their goals are negatively related to others’ goals. Accordingly, one person’s progress is perceived as interfering with and making it less likely that others will reach their goals (Deutsch 1949, 2006).

Introduction

As a situational variable, the psychological definition of competition emphasizes the perceived incompatibility of individual or group goals. However, whether real or imagined, environments perceived as competitive or having a win/lose framework influence both individual and group behavior (Levi 2017). While much of the early research on competition emerged from social psychology (the Latin root – competere means to meet or come together), competition is now an important research topic in a number of applied fields. Currently, research on competition ranges from the evolution of cognition and behavior using the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cannon, M. D., & Griffith, B. A. (2007). Effective groups: Concepts and skills to meet leadership challenges. Boston: Pearson Allyn and Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casto, K. V., & Edwards, D. A. (2016). Testosterone, cortisol, and human competition. Hormones and Behavior, 82, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dabbs, J. M., de la Rue, D., & Williams, P. M. (1990). Testosterone and occupational choice: Actors, ministers, and other men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1261–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (2006). Cooperation and competition. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 23–42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). Work and family orientation questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J., Harris, P., McIntire, S., & Francis, D. (2002). Revising the competitiveness index using factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.90.1.31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1992). No contest (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, D. (2017). Group dynamics for teams (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1996). Construction of a personal development attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, R., Liu, D., & Shen, W. M. (2016). Research note – Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smither, R. D., & Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: The development and validation of the competitiveness index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052002016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, B., Ryckman, R. M., & Gold, J. A. (2011). Hypercompetitiveness and relationships: Further implications for romantic, family, and peer relationships. Psychology, 4, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.24043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triplett, N. (1897). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. The American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & VanVugt, M. (2014). Social dilemmas: The psychology of human cooperation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Houston .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Houston, J.M., Queen, J.S. (2019). Competition. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1615-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1615-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics