Encyclopedia of Latin American Religions

2019 Edition
| Editors: Henri Gooren

Science and New Age

  • Rodrigo ToniolEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27078-4_78

Definition

One of the notable characteristics of New Age thinking is the high regard it displays for modern science. At first sight this may seem surprising given that New Agers also tend to distrust and reject academic rationalism. However, the contradiction is only apparent. Modern scientific developments appeal to New Age concerns for two main reasons: these advances are interpreted in ways that legitimate a spiritual worldview and, at the same time, they also serve as weapons to break down the existing scientific consensus (Hanegraaff 1998, p. 62). Nonetheless, this relationship is not only one way: we can also identify a “New Age Science.”

Introduction

The relationship between New Age and science is a recurrent topic in the social science literature. These analyses emphasize the historical roots of this connection, pointing to the work of academics and researchers within the countercultural movements that gave rise to the New Age movement while also focusing on the kinds of...

Keywords

Science Holism Nature philosophy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baer H (2004) Toward an integrative medicine: merging alternative therapies with biomedicine. AltaMira Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell V, Troxel D (2001) Spirituality and the person with dementia-a view from the field. J Alzheimers Care Today 2(2):31–45Google Scholar
  3. Berntson G et al (2008) Spirituality and autonomic cardiac control. Ann Behav Med 35(2):198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer-Smyth K, Koenig H (2014) Could spirituality and religion promote stress resilience in survivors of childhood trauma? Issues Ment Health Nurs 35(4):251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra D (1989) Quantum healing: exploring the frontiers of mind/body medicine. Bantam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzler B (2001) The lure of the edge: scientific passions, religious beliefs and the pursuit of UFOs. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunbar H (1943) Psychosomatic diagnosis. Hoeber, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. English-Lueck JA (1990) Health in the New Age: a study in California holistic practices. University of New Mexico Press, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  9. Garssen B, Uwland-Sikkema N, Visser A (2014) How spirituality helps cancer patients with the adjustment to their disease. J Relig Health 4(54):1–17Google Scholar
  10. Hanegraaff W (1998) New Age religion and Western culture. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  11. Hess DJ (1993) Science in the New Age: the paranormal, its defenders and debunkers, and American culture. The University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill P, Pargament K (2003) Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. Am Psychol 58:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivakhiv AJ (2001) Claiming sacred ground: pilgrims and politics at Glastonbury and Sedona. Indian University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Koenig H (2008) Concerns about measuring “spirituality” in research. Nerv Ment Dis 196(8):643–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis J (1994) The encyclopedia of afterlife beliefs and phenomena. Gale Research, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis J (2007) Science and the New Age. In: Kemp D, Lewis J (eds) Handbook of New Age. Brill, Boston, pp 207–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothstein M (2004) Science and religion in the new religions. In: Lewis JR (ed) The Oxford handbook of new religious movements. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Spangler D (2004) The meaning of Gaia. In: Lewis JR (ed) The encyclopedic sourcebook of New Age religions. Prometheus Books, Amherst/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Talbot M (1981) Mysticism and the new physics, Bantam Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanyi R (2002) Towards clarification of the meaning of spirituality. J Adv Nurs 39:500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilber K (ed) (1982) The holographic paradigm and other paradoxes: exploring the leading edge of science. Shambhala, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  22. York M (2003) Contemporary academic study of astrology. In: Lewis JR (ed) The astrology book: the encyclopedia of heavenly influences. Visible Ink Press, DetroitGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AnthropologyFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil