Gender and New Age
The dimension of gender is central to an understanding of New Age movements and spiritualities and affects various aspects. The first is the influence of feminism, along with the values of the counterculture movements, on the values and moral configurations of the New Age. The second is the important presence (quantitative and qualitative) of women in the New Age spiritualities and on their various hierarchical scales. The third aspect is that of how values, discourses, and practices related to New Age spiritualities are based on gender perspectives that are distinct but not necessarily exclusive: a perspective that emphasizes sexual difference and a critical perspective on the dualisms of gender.
More than being just one of the aspects of New Age spiritualities and movements, the feminist and gender dimensions are constitutive of these movements, in the ways that sexual difference is both represented and constructed at the interior of these movements.
KeywordsFeminism Counterculture Difference Individualism Goddess Gender and feminist studies
- Braude A (1989) Radical spirits: spiritualism and women’s rights in nineteenth-century America. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Heelas P (1995) Introduction: detraditionalization and its rivals. In: Heelas P, Lash S, Morris P (eds) Detraditionalization: critical reflections on authority and identity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- Heelas P, Woodhead L et al (2005) The spiritual revolution. Why religion is giving way to spirituality. Blackwel, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Houtman D, Aupers S (2008) The spiritual revolution and de new age gender puzzle: the sacralization of the self in late modernity (1980–2000). In: Aune K, Sharma S, Vincett G (eds) Women and religion in the west. Challengin secularization. Ashgate, Birlington, pp 99–118Google Scholar
- Scott J (1996) Only paradoxes to offer: French feminists and the rights of man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Woodhead L (2007) Gender differences in religious practice and significance. In: Beckford J, Demerath NJ III (eds) The sage handbook of the sociology of religion. Sage, Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore, pp 550–570Google Scholar