Psychological Types (Jung)
The concept of psychological types, which we can define as the regular differences in the way people become aware of and try to cope with their psychological issues, even when they are dealing with challenges to psyche that are similar, is a distinctive contribution of C. G. Jung to the development of depth psychology.
Jung focused on the basic principle that in relating to the psyche, we are what we are observing. Therefore, our “personal equation” (Shamdasani 2003, pp. 30–31) must be taken into account when we look at our complexes and at the complexes of others who are sufficiently significant to us to become, in effect, parts of our own psychological life.
Jung’s studies in Paris immediately after receiving his MD in Basel brought him into contact with both Janet, who was studying subconscious fixed ideas, and Binet, who was exploring different forms of consciousness that affected the way people learn. Binet’s notions of “introspection” (“the knowledge we have of our...
- Bergson, H. (1907). Creative evolution. (A. Mitchell, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- von Franz, M.-L., & Hillman, J. (1971). Lectures on Jung’s typology. New York: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
- Haas, L., & Hunziker, M. (2011). Building blocks of personality type. Temecula: TypeLabs.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. G. (1943/1966). The relations between the ego and the unconscious. In Two essays in analytical psychology, 2nd edition. The collected works of C. G. Jung, (Vol. 7, pp. 121–171) (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. G. & Riklin, F. (1905/1969). Studies in word-association: Experiments in the diagnosis of psychopathological conditions carried out at the psychiatric clinic of the University of Zurich. (M. Eder, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Jung, C. G. & Schmid-Guisan, H. (2013). In J. Beebe, & E. Falzeder (Eds.), The question of psychological types: The correspondence of C. G. Jung and Hans Schmid-Guisan, 1915–1916. (E. Falzeder & T. Woolfson, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Murphy, E. (1992). The developing child: Using Jungian type to understand children. Palo Alto: Davies-Black Publishing.Google Scholar
- Myers, I. B. with Myers, P. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Shamdasani, S. (1998). The lost contributions of Maria Moltzer to analytical psychology. Spring: A Journal of Archetype and Culture, 64, 103–119.Google Scholar