Submission to the requirements of an authority.
The standard definition of obedience in psychology is as a form of social influence elicited in response to a direct order or command. However, there are reasons for suggesting that this definition is too narrow in that it specifies that a particular social act – the order or command – is necessary for obedience to occur. Consideration of how the term “obedience” and its derivatives are used in everyday language is instructive. People refer to obeying the law or obeying the word of God, but in neither situation is a direct order required. For example, we don’t typically need an authority figure such as a police officer to order us to drive on the correct side of road or to refrain from leaving a store without paying for our goods. Indeed, for a society to function smoothly, it is necessary that people are able to go about their daily lives without authority having to be exercised directly in the form of explicit...
- Blass, T. (2004). The man who shocked the world: The life and legacy of Stanley Milgram. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Elms, A. C., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 282–289.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Birney, M. E. (2014). Nothing by mere authority: Evidence that in an experimental analogue of the Milgram paradigm participants are motivated not by orders but by appeals to authority. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 473–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Miller, A. G. (1986). The obedience experiments: A case study of controversy in social science. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Perry, G. (2012). Behind the shock machine: The untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. London: Scribe.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 59–82). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Zeigler-Hill, V., Southard, A. C., Archer, L. M., & Donohoe, P. L. (2013). Neuroticism and negative affect influence the reluctance to engage in destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.713041.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar