Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Deborah C Poff, Alex C. Michalos


  • Craig FurneauxEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_221-1



In Western economies, the charging of interest for loans is just something that is rarely questioned. It is deemed necessary, in order to generate income and to offset the risk that loans might not be repaid (Benfield 1968). Modern Western legal prohibitions against usury, such as they are, center on the notion of preventing financial service organizations from charging excessive interest (Lewison 1999), which is certainly how modern dictionaries define it (Oxford Living Dictionaries 2017). However, this was, and is, not always the case.

For millennia, the charging of any interest on loans at all was considered ethically wrong in many cultures and religions (El-Gamal 2006; Meislin and Cohen 1964). In both premedieval Europe and the Middle East, the charging of interest of loans was prohibited by religious authorities (Mews and Abraham 2007). However, during the Renaissance and Reformation,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Benfield M (1968) Money, mortgages, and migraine–the usury headache. Case West Reserv Law Rev 19:819–899Google Scholar
  2. Blitz RC, Long MF (1965) The economics of usury regulation. J Polit Econ 73(6):608–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavalier G (2013) Is the economic crisis driving western laws closer to islamic laws on interest rate prohibition? Int J Econ Perspect 7(2):47–56Google Scholar
  4. Chewning RC (1995) Interest. In: Atkinson DJ, Field DH, Holmes AF, O’Donovan O (eds) New dictionary of Christian ethics and pastoral theology. Inter Varsity Press, Downers Grove, pp 496–498Google Scholar
  5. Conter D (1989) Eagleton, judge Posner, and Shylock v. Antonio. McGill LJ 35:905Google Scholar
  6. Ekelund RB, Hébert RF, Tollison RD (1989) An economic model of the medieval church: usury as a form of rent seeking. J Law Econ Organ 5(2):307–331Google Scholar
  7. El-Gamal MA (2006) Islamic finance: law, economics, and practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ford R (1926) Imprisonment for Debt. Mich Law Rev 25(1):24–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gatgounis I, George J (1996) The political theory of John Calvin. Bibliotheca Sacra 153:60–75Google Scholar
  10. George C (1957) English Calvinist opinion on usury, 1600–1640. J Hist Ideas 18(4):455–474.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2707559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaeser EL, Scheinkman J (1998) Neither a borrower nor a lender be: an economic analysis of interest restrictions and usury Laws. J Law Econ 41(1):1–36.  https://doi.org/10.1086/467383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graafland JJ (2010) Calvin's restrictions on interest: guidelines for the credit crisis. J Bus Ethics 96(2):233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helfand MA (2011) Fighting for the Debtor's soul: regulating religious commercial conduct. Geo Mason L Rev 19:157Google Scholar
  14. Hollander S (1999) Jeremy Bentham and Adam smith on the usury laws: a ‘Smithian’ reply to Bentham and a new problem. J Hist Econ Thought 6(4):523–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horack BS (1941) A survey of the general usury laws. Law Contemp Probl 8:36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jafri SHA, Margolis LS (1999) The treatment of usury in the holy scriptures. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 41(4–5):371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewison M (1999) Conflicts of interest? The ethics of usury. J Bus Ethics 22(4):327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mansfield C (2000) The road to subprime hell was paved with good congressional intentions: usury deregulation and the subprime home equity market. S C Law Rev 51(3):473–588Google Scholar
  19. Meislin BJ, Cohen ML (1964) Backgrounds of the biblical law against usury. Comp Stud Soc Hist 6(3):250–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mews CJ, Abraham I (2007) Usury and just compensation: religious and financial ethics in historical perspective. J Bus Ethics 72(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9151-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oxford Living Dictionaries (2017) Usury. Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/usury
  22. Posner EA (1995) Contract law in the welfare state: a defense of the unconscionability doctrine, usury laws, and related limitations on the freedom to contract. J Leg Stud 24(2):283–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reed CG, Bekar CT (2003) Religious prohibitions against usury. Explor Econ Hist 40(4):347–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4983(03)00039-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandberg J (2012) Mega-interest on microcredit: are lenders exploiting the poor? J Appl Philos 29(3):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sauer JB (2002) Metaphysics and economy – the problem of interest: a comparison of the practice and ethics of interest in Islamic and Christian cultures. Int J Soc Econ 29(1/2):97–118.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290210413010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silberg M, Ben Porath AI (1961) Law and morals in Jewish jurisprudence. Harv Law Rev 75(2):306–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tamari M (1990) Ethical issues in bankruptcy: a Jewish perspective. J Bus Ethics 9(10):785–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Visser WAM, Macintosh A (1998) A short review of the historical critique of usury. Account Bus Financ Hist 8(2):175–189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095852098330503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit StudiesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Andrew West
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Accountancy, QUT Business SchoolQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia