Skip to main content

Behavioral Ethics and Euphemisms

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 190 Accesses

Synonyms

Mechanisms for mediating cognitive dissonance with respect to unethical behavior; Rationalization theory

Definition

Behavioral ethics is the social scientific study of ethical and unethical behavior. The field occupies a space distinct from normative or legal approaches to ethics, which explore how individuals should behave, and instead aims to understand through empirical study how individuals actually do behave in ethical contexts and why.

Euphemisms are the substitution of words or phrases that evoke negative psychological effects. Euphemisms operate by making harmful conduct less so, thereby reducing personal responsibility for it. Euphemisms are often described as a process of moral disengagement, but a more accurate description from a behavioral ethics standpoint is that they are an aid to rationalization. Rationalizations, the psychological mechanism by which individuals internally verbalize justifications for future unethical or illegal acts so as to keep their...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Id. at 153. See also, Anand et al. (2005) (discussing how employees perpetrating corrupt acts engage in “rationalizing tactics” and identifying six tactics); Heath (2008) (suggesting that bureaucratic organizations “might constitute peculiarly criminogenic environments” and discussing how that fosters rationalizations); Prentice (2015), at 69–74 (identifying rationalizations and discussing how organizations can help thwart them); Haugh (2015) (analyzing rationalizations’ role in white collar crime and how it is fostered by overcriminalization).

  2. 2.

    Cressey, supra note [1965], at 15. See also, Todd Haugh, The Criminalization of Compliance, 92 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1215 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Cressey, supra note [1965], at 15.

  4. 4.

    Cressey, supra note [1965], at 15.

  5. 5.

    Cressey, supra note [1965], at 15.

References

  • Anand V, Ashforth BE, Joshi M (2005) Business as usual: the acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Acad Manage perspect 19:9, 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perception of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 3:193, 195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman MH, Gino F (2012) Behavioral ethics: toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci 8:85, 90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey DR (1965) The respectable criminal. Criminologica 3:13, 14–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey DR (1973) Other people’s money: a study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Patterson Smith, Montclair, p 94–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana J, Lowenstein G, Weber R (2012) Ethical immunity: how people violate their own moral standards without feeling they are doing so. In: De Cremer D, Tenbrunsel AE (eds) Behavioral business ethics. Routledge, New York, p 202

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyke J, Lucas K (2014) J Bus Ethics 122:551 [7]

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh T (2015) Overcriminalization’s new harm paradigm. Vand Law Rev 68:1191, 1214–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh T (2017) The criminalization of compliance, 92 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath J (2008) Business ethics and moral motivation: a criminological perspective. J Bus Ethics 83:595, 602–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackall R (1988) Moral mazes: the world of corporate managers. Int J Polit Cult Soc 1:598, 609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • la Cour A, Kromann J (2011) Euphemism and hypocrisy in corporate philanthropy. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 20:267–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone MS, Beck G, Pfiester A (2006) Contamination and camouflage in euphemisms. Commun Monogr 73:261, 263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore C et al (2012) Why employees do bad things: moral disengagement and unethical behavior. Pers Psychol 65:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz CP (2011) Noun-noun euphemisms in the language of the global financial crisis. Atlantis 33:137, 138. (internal quotation and citation omitted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice R (2015) Behavioral ethics: can it help lawyers (and others) to be their best selves? Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy 29:35–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel AE, Messick D (2004) Ethical fading: the role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Soc Justice Res 17:223, 226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd Haugh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Haugh, T. (2018). Behavioral Ethics and Euphemisms. In: Poff, D., Michalos, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_198-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_198-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23514-1

  • eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics