Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Logic in Early Modern Thought

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Sources

  • (VFI) Traité des Vrais et des Fausses Idées de Antoine Arnauld (1843) In: Oeuvres Philosophiques d’Arnauld – Comprenant Les Objections contre les Méditations de Descartes, La Logique de Port Royal, Le Traité des Vrais et des Fausses Idées – avec des notes et une introduction par C. Jourdain, Paris, L. Hachette, Éditeur, Librairie Ladrange

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld A, Nicole P (1967) La Logique ou L’Art de Penser – contenant Outre les règles communes, plusieurs observations nouvelles, propres à former le jugement. Édition Critique présentée par Pierre Clair et François Girbal. PUF, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld A, Nicole P (1996) Logic or the art of thinking: containing, besides common rules, several new observations appropriate for forming judgment (trans and ed: Buroker JV). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon F (2003) The new Organon (ed: Jardine L, Silverthorne M). Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R (2006) The philosophical writings of Descartes (trans: Cottingham J, Soothoff R, Murdoch D), vols I and II. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1923 ff) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Reihe I–VIII. Akademie Berlin, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1960–61) Die Philosophischen Schriften (hrsg: von Gerhard CI), 7 vols. Olms, Hildesheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1966) Logical papers (ed: Parkinson GHR). Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1971) Mathematische Schriften (hrsg: von Gerhard CI), 7 vols. Olms Verlag, Hildesheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1988) Opuscules et fragments inédits (ed: Couturat L). Olms Verlag, Hildesheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW (1989) Philosophical papers and letters. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Ashworth J (2008) Developments in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. In: The handbook of the history of logic. Vol. 2: Medieval and renaissance logic (ed: Gabbay DM, Woods J). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 609–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Buroker JV (1996) The Port-Royal semantics of terms. Synthese 96(3):455–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buroker JV (1997) Judgment and predication in the Port-Royal logic. In: The great Arnauld and some of his philosophical correspondents (ed: Kremer EJ). University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Carriero J (2008) The Cartesian circle and the foundations of knowledge. In: Broughton J, Carriero J (eds) A companion to Descartes. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 302–318

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (2008) Descartes and Galileo: copernicanism and the metaphysical foundations of physics. In: Broughton J, Carriero J (eds) A companion to Descartes. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 69–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (1975) Why does language matter to philosophy? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna R (1991) How ideas became meanings: Locke and the foundations of semantic theory. Rev Metaphys 44(4):775–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield G (1997) The logic of ideas and faculty psychology in early modern philosophy. In: Logic and the workings of mind (ed: Patricia A). Easton, Atascadero, pp 21–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneale W, Kneale M (1962) The development of logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzmann N (1967) History of semantics. In: The encyclopedia of philosophy (ed: Edwards P), vol 7. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen W (1990) Das System der Leibnizschen Logik. De Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen W (2004a) Calculus universalis. Studien zur Logik von G.W. Leibniz. Mentis, Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen W (2004b) Leibniz’s logic. In: Gabbay DM, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the history of logic, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy L (2017) Notas Sobre o Conceito De Atenção Em Descartes. Modernos Contemp 1(2):46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lolordo A (2005) “Descarte’s one rule of logic”: Gassendi’s critique of the doctrine of clear and distinct perception. Br J Hist Philos 13(1):51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael F (1997) Why logic became epistemology: Gassendi, port royal and the reformation in logic. In: Logic and the workings of mind (ed: Easton PA). Atascadero, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkeli H (1992) An Aristotelian response to renaissance humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the nature of arts and sciences. Stud Hist 41, Helsinki, p 199

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler S (1989) Arnauld and the Cartesian philosophy of ideas. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariente J-C (1985) Les Termes Logiques et la Détermination. In: L’Analyse du langage à Port-Royal – six études logico-grammaticales. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris, pp 183–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K (2010) Matter matters: metaphysics and methodology in the early modern period. Oxford Press scholarship online. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson F (1999) The logic and methodology of science in early modern thought: seven studies. Toronto studies in philosophy. University of Toronto Press Incorporated, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, State University of Rio de Janeiro – UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Katarina R. Peixoto

  2. State University of Rio de Janeiro – UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Edgar da Rocha Marques

Authors
  1. Katarina R. Peixoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edgar da Rocha Marques
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarina R. Peixoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Dana Jalobeanu

  2. Dept. of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University Dept. Philosophy & Moral Sci, Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

    Charles T. Wolfe

Section Editor information

  1. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Martin Lenz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Peixoto, K.R., da Rocha Marques, E. (2020). Logic in Early Modern Thought. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_594-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_594-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation