Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Dana Jalobeanu, Charles T. Wolfe

Soul, Seat of the

  • Paolo PecereEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_556-1
  • 13 Downloads

Introduction

This article surveys metaphysical and physiological investigations of the seat of the soul. After introducing the Scholastic background of the problem (section “From the Scholastics to Vesalius”), I focus on the turn that is represented by Cartesian philosophy (section “The Cartesian Turn”), then address the metaphysical (section “Metaphysical Controversies”) and physiological (section “Experimental Traditions and Physiological Hypotheses”) controversies between the seventeenth and the eighteenth centuries. Kant’s criticism that the quest for the seat of the soul is an “impossible” task introduces a conclusion on the legacy of the problem in neurophysiology (section “Kant’s Critique and the Fate of the Seat of the Soul”).

From the Scholastics to Vesalius

The question concerning the seat of the soul traditionally involved both a metaphysical and a medical dimension: on the one hand, different conceptions of the soul determined whether it made sense to search for its place...

Related Topics

Soul Neurophysiology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AA = von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (hrsg) (1900) Kants gesammelte Schriften. Reimer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. AT = Adam C, Tannery P (eds) (1897) Oeuvres de Descartes. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Eustachius a Sancto Paulo (1648) Summa philosophiae quadripartita. Roger Daniel, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Gabbey A (1995) Henry More lecteur de Descartes: philosophie naturelle et apologétique. Arch Philos 58:364–365Google Scholar
  5. GP = Leibniz GW (1875–1890) Die philosophischen Schriften. Weidmann, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Hagner M (2008) Homo cerebralis. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.MGoogle Scholar
  7. Haller A (1757–1766) Elementa physiologiae corporis humani, 8 vols. Bousquet et al, Bern/LausanneGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartley D (1749) Observations on man, his frame, his duty and his expectations. Richardson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hatfield G (1988) Neuro-philosophy meets psychology. Cogn Neuropsychol 5:723–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobbes T (1839–1845) The English works. J. Bohn, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Malebranche (1958–) Oeuvres completes. Vrin, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Michel M (forthcoming) Consciousness science underdetermined. https://www.ergophiljournal.org/
  13. Newton I (2004) Philosophical writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Nussbaum MC, Putnam H (1992) Changing Aristotle’s mind. In: Nussbaum MC, Oksenberg Rorty A (eds) Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 27–56Google Scholar
  15. Pasnau R (2011) Metaphysical themes 1274–1671. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pecere P (2016) Kant’s Über das Organ der Seele and the limits of physiology. In: Hanna R et al (eds) Kant’s shorter writings. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle, pp 214–230Google Scholar
  17. Pecere P (2018) Lois, sensations et nerfs. Possibilité et limites de la neurophysiologie des fonctions mentales de Kant à Helmholtz. In: Cherici C, Dupont JC, Wolfe CT (eds) Physique de l’esprit. Hermann, Paris, pp 161–180Google Scholar
  18. Rozemond M (2003) Descartes, mind-body union, and holenmerism. Philos Top 31:343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scribano E (2015) Macchine con la mente. Carocci, RomaGoogle Scholar
  20. Shapiro L (2011) Descartes’s pineal gland reconsidered. Midwest Stud Philos 35:259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singer C (1952) Vesalius on the human brain. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Soemmering ST (1796) Über das Organ der Seele. Königsberg, NicoloviusGoogle Scholar
  23. Spinoza B (1985) Ethics demonstrated in geometric order [1677]. In: Curley E (ed) The collected works of Spinoza. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 408–617Google Scholar
  24. Steno N (1669) Discours sur l’anatomie du cerveau. Robert de Ninville, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Willis T (1684) Two discourses concerning the soul of brutes. In: Dr. Willis’s practice of physick, being the whole works of that renowned and famous physician, 2nd edn. Dringer, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Communication and Performing ArtsUniversità Roma TreRomeItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dana Jalobeanu
    • 1
  • Charles T. Wolfe
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Sarton Centre for History of ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium