Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Dana Jalobeanu, Charles T. Wolfe

Novatores: Rejecting Aristotle and Forging a New Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century

  • Daniel GarberEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_496-1

Synonyms

Introduction

The early modern period was a time of innovation and change, generally considered the beginning of science and philosophy as we now understand it. There have been numerous historical debates about how this happened. In the popular literature, the textbooks, and the classroom, the focus has been on certain great figures like Kepler and Galileo, Descartes and Bacon, and Hobbes and Harvey, among others, who are taken to be principally responsible for the emergence of the new ideas and perspectives. But in the early seventeenth century, things looked somewhat different. When the figures we now consider the first moderns emerged, it was in the context of a host of other figures, called by their contemporaries the “novatores” or “innovators.” When this historiographical category emerged in the early seventeenth century, though, it was not intended as a compliment. Though it will become something positive later in the century, when first...

Related Topics

Reformation Scientific revolution 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cavaillé JP (2009) Libérer le libertinage: Une catégorie à l’épreuve des sources. Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 64:45–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Vries G (1683) Introductionis historicae ad Cartesii philosophiam pars secunda. Meinardus à Dreunen, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Denzinger H (1963) Enchiridion symbolorum, 32nd edn. Herder, Rome/FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Fumaroli M (ed) (2001) La Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Furetière A (1690) Dictionnaire universel, 3 vols. A and R Leers, The Hague/RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Garber D (2002) Defending Aristotle/defending society in early 17th C Paris. In: Zittel C, Detel C (eds) Wissensideale und Wissenskulturen in der frühen Neuzeit (Ideals and culture of knowledge in early modern Europe). Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp 135–160Google Scholar
  7. Garber D (2016) Why the scientific revolution wasn’t a revolution and why it matters. In: Richards RJ, Daston L (eds) Kuhn’s Structure of scientific revolutions at fifty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 133–148Google Scholar
  8. Grant E (ed) (1974) A sourcebook in medieval science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Krumenacker Y (2006) La généalogie imaginaire de la Réforme protestante. Rev Hist 308:259–289Google Scholar
  10. Kusukawa S (1995) The transformation of natural philosophy: the case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Launoy J (1653) De varia Aristotelis in academia parisiensi fortuna … liber. Edmund Martin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Leibniz GW, Loemker L (ed and trans) (1976) Philosophical papers and letters. D. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Lukács L (1986) Ratio atque institutio studiorum Societatis Iesu (1586, 1591, 1599). Monumenta Paedagogica Societatis Iesu, vol 5. Institutum Historicum Societatis Iesu, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Malebranche N, Lennon T, Olscamp P (ed and trans) (1997) The search after truth and elucidations of the search after truth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin C (2014) Subverting Aristotle: religion, history, and philosophy in early modern science. Johns Hopkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Mercer C (1990) The seventeenth-century debate between the Moderns and the Aristotelians: Leibniz and Philosophia Reformata. In: Marchlewitz I, Heinekamp A (eds) Leibniz’ Auseinandersetzung mit Vorgängern und Zeitgenossen. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 18–29Google Scholar
  17. Mersenne M (1623) Quaestiones celeberrimae in Genesim. Sebastian Cramoisy, ParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Mersenne M (1625) La vérité des sciences. Toussainct du Bray, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Morin JB (1624) Refutation des theses erronees d’Anthoine Villon … et Estienne de Claves. Chez l’Autheur, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Pascal B (1910) Thoughts, letters, minor works. PF Collier and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Pullapilly CK (1975) Caesar Baronius, Counter-Reformation historian. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  22. Randall J (1631) Twenty nine lectures of the Church very necessary for the consolation and support of Gods Church. Felix Kyngston for Nathanael Newbery, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Saur G (1708) Relatio historica judiciorum et censurarum adversus philosophiam anti-peripateticam. JM Kleyer, WürtzburgGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmitt C (1983) Aristotle and the Renaissance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomasius J (1693) Dissertationes LXIII. JF Zeiterlus, Halle an der SaaleGoogle Scholar
  26. Verbeek T (1988) La Querelle d’Utrecht: René Descartes et Martin Schoock. Impressions nouvelles, ParisGoogle Scholar
  27. Wotton W (1694) Reflections upon ancient and modern learning. J Leake for P Buck, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dana Jalobeanu
    • 1
  • Charles T. Wolfe
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Sarton Centre for History of ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium