Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Dana Jalobeanu, Charles T. Wolfe

Liberty, Women on

  • Jacqueline BroadEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_424-1
  • 3 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

In the seventeenth century and early 1700s, several women thinkers discuss the concept of liberty in its various metaphysical, moral, and political guises. Among these women are Elisabeth of Bohemia, Margaret Cavendish, Anne Conway, Mary Astell, Gabrielle Suchon, Damaris Cudworth Masham, Sarah Chapone, Catharine Trotter Cockburn, and Emilie Du Châtelet. Some of these writers touch on issues to do with freedom and determinism, such as the problem of reconciling the existence of human free will with a purely materialist theory of causation. Some raise problems for free will based on the fact that the mind is frequently incapable of overcoming the influence of the passions and other antecedent causes. Others extend their views about human agency to moral and political issues concerning liberty, with a specific focus on the freedom of women as a socio-political group (for overviews, see Broad and Detlefsen 2017; Broad 2014a).

This...

Related Topics

Women philosophers Metaphysics Feminism Education Marriage 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Astell M (1996) Reflections upon marriage. In: Springborg P (ed) Political writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Astell M (2002) A serious proposal to the ladies, parts I and II (ed: Springborg P). Broadview Press, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  3. Astell M (2013) The Christian religion, as professed by a daughter of the Church of England (ed: J Broad). Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies and Iter Publishing, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyle D (2013) Margaret Cavendish on gender, nature, and freedom. Hypatia 28(3):516–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyle D (2017) Freedom and necessity in the work of Margaret Cavendish. In: Broad J, Detlefsen K (eds) Women and liberty, 1600–1800: philosophical essays. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 141–162Google Scholar
  6. Boyle D (2018) The well-ordered universe: the philosophy of Margaret Cavendish. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Broad J (2012) Impressions in the brain: Malebranche on women, women on Malebranche. Intellectual History Review 22(3):373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broad J (2014a) Women on liberty in early modern England. Philos Compass 9(2):112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broad J (2014b) Mary Astell on marriage and Lockean slavery. Hist Polit Thought 35(4):717–738Google Scholar
  10. Broad J (2015a) ‘A great championess for her sex’: Sarah Chapone on liberty as nondomination and self-mastery. Monist 98(1):77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broad J (2015b) The philosophy of Mary Astell: an early modern theory of virtue. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broad J, Detlefsen K (eds) (2017) Women and liberty, 1600–1800: philosophical essays. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Cavendish M (1655) The preface to the reader. In: The worlds olio. Written by the Right Honorable, the Lady Margaret Newcastle. Martin J and Allestrye J, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavendish M (2003) Orations of divers sorts, accommodated to divers places (1662). In: James S (ed) Political writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavendish M (2004) Sociable letters (ed: Fitzmaurice J). Broadview Press, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapone S (2018) The hardships of the English Laws in relation to wives by Sarah Chapone (ed: Glover SP). Routledge, Abingdon/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunning D (2016) Cavendish. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Detlefsen K (2007) Reason and freedom: Margaret Cavendish on the order and disorder of nature. Arch Gesch Philos 89:157–191Google Scholar
  19. Detlefsen K (2016) Custom, freedom and equality: Mary Astell on marriage and women’s education. In: Sowaal A, Weiss P (eds) Feminist interpretations of Mary Astell. Penn State University Press, University Park, pp 74–92Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes T (1996) Leviathan (ed: Tuck R). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Lister A (2004) Marriage and misogyny: the place of Mary Astell in the history of political thought. Hist Polit Thought 25(1):44–72Google Scholar
  22. Smith HL (1997) ‘A general war amongst the men … but none amongst the women’: political differences between Margaret and William Cavendish. In: Nenner H (ed) Politics and the political imagination in later Stuart Britain: essays presented to Lois Green Schwoerer. University of Rochester Press, New York, pp 143–160Google Scholar
  23. Springborg P (2005) Mary Astell: theorist of freedom from domination. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Staves S (1990) Married women’s separate property in England, 1660–1833. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Department, School of Philosophical, Historical and International StudiesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ruth Hagengruber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Humanwissenschaften, PhilosophieUniversität PaderbornPaderbornDeutschland