Skip to main content

Theodicy in the Early Modern Context

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences
  • 142 Accesses

Introduction

First coined by the great polymath Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) as the title of the only book he published in his lifetime, the term “theodicy” has come to denote a certain kind of theistic response to the problem of evil: the question “why, if the world is created by an all-powerful, all-good God, does it contain evils such as genocide or natural disasters?” Named from the Greek words theos (God) and dike (justice), a theodicy attempts to answer this question, thereby vindicating the justice of God in the face of the world’s evils.

The Early Modern Context

The problem of evil is not modern (in the ancient world a formulation of the problem was attributed to Epicurus and clearly articulated by Cicero and Sextus Empiricus). However, it came to be expressed in distinctive ways in the modern period. Whereas ancient and medieval philosophers tended to focus on the question of the originof evil (where does evil come from, if not from God, the creator of all?), modern...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams RM (1994) Leibniz: determinist, theist, idealist. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams RM (2013) Malebranche’s causal concepts. In: The divine order, the human order, and the order of nature : historical perspectives, E. Watkins. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alston W (1996) The inductive argument from evil and the human cognitive condition. In: Howard-Snyder D (ed) (1996) The evidential argument from evil (Indiana University Press, Bloomington), pp 97–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Black AG (1997) Malebranche’s theodicy. J Hist Philos 35:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cladis M (1995) Tragedy and theodicy: a meditation on Rousseau and moral evil. J Relig 75(2):181–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descartes R et al (1985) The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S (2008) Leibniz on king: freedom and the project of the “Theodicy”. Studia Leibnitiana 40(2):205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Snyder D (ed) (1996) The evidential argument from evil. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D, Popkin R (eds) (1998) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer EJ (2000) Malebranche on human freedom. In: The Cambridge companion to Malebranche, Steven M. Nadler. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leduc C, Rateau P, Solère J-L, (2014) Leibniz et Bayle: Confrontation Et Dialogue, Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz GW, Huggard EM, Farrer AM (1985) Theodicy. Open Court Publishing, La Salle, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon TM (1999) Reading Bayle. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malebranche N, Riley P (1992) Treatise on nature and grace. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael T (2011) Hume and the problem of evil. In: Jordan JJ (ed) Philosophy of religion: the key thinkers. Continuum, London/New York, pp 159–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman S (2002) Evil in modern thought: an alternative history of philosophy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike N (1963) Hume on evil. Philos Rev 72(2):180–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope A (1954) An essay on man. In: The poetry of Pope. AMH Publishing, Arlington Heights

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragland CP (2016) The will to reason: theodicy and freedom in Descartes. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rateau P (2019) Leibniz on the problem of evil. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire, Fleming W (2005) The Lisbon earthquake. N Engl Rev 26(3):183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wykstra SJ (1996) Rowe’s Noseeum arguments from evil. In: Howard-Snyder D (ed) (1996) The evidential argument from evil (Indiana University Press, Bloomington), pp 126–150

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. P. Ragland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ragland, C.P. (2020). Theodicy in the Early Modern Context. In: Jalobeanu, D., Wolfe, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20791-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics