Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Selection for Cooperative Relationships

  • Matthew J. Johnson
  • Stephen M. ColarelliEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3494-1

Synonyms

Definition

Individuals (or groups) working together for a mutual benefit.

Introduction

“Many of the benefits sought by living things are disproportionately available to cooperating groups” (Axelrod and Hamilton 1981, p. 1391)

Cooperationinvolves individuals (or groups) working together for a mutual benefit, often at an initial cost to each participant, although the benefits from cooperation ultimately outweigh the costs to individuals. Cooperation is associated (conceptually and empirically) with altruism – behavior in which an individual forgoes a benefit to assist another. Some degree of altruism is necessary (at least initially) for cooperation to occur. To cooperate, an individual must initially give up a benefit. Altruism becomes cooperation when two or more individuals join in giving up benefits for a common goal, which they typically perceive as greater than the cost of the benefits they gave up. Our...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Handwerk, B. (2014, September 30). How climate change may have shaped human evolution. Smithsonian. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-climate-change-may-have-shaped-human-evolution-180952885/
  6. Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437, 1291–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2015). Trust: An integrative review from a person-situation perspective. General Review of Psychology, 19, 249–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53, 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Central Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kevin Kniffin
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA