Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Convergent Evolution of Intelligence Between Corvids and Primates

  • Danielle SulikowskiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3107-1

Synonyms

Definition

Convergent evolution describes the analogous (as opposed to homologous) acquisition of similar traits in phylogenetically diverse species facing similar selection pressures. Corvids and primates are often observed to exhibit highly intelligent behavior (with intelligence typically operationalized in this context as those behaviors that indicate the presence of advanced capacities once thought unique to humans or cognitive capacities which surpass those of humans). This led Emery and Clayton (2004) to identify primates and corvids as a case of convergent evolution of intelligence, citing the two groups’ capacity for causal reasoning, cognitive flexibility, imagination, and prospection as the key ingredients of a shared cognitive toolkit.

Introduction

Primates and corvids comprise some of the most enigmatic study species in the field of comparative...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Call, J. (2010). Trapping the minds of apes: Causal knowledge and inferential reasoning about object–object interactions. In E. V. Lonsdorf, S. R. Ross, & T. Matsuzawa (Eds.), The mind of the chimpanzee: Ecological and experimental perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2004). The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science, 306, 1903–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Holekamp, K. E. (2007). Questioning the social intelligence hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner. Translation of: Köhler, W. (1917). Intelligenzprüfungen an Anthropoiden (trans: Winter, E.). Berlin: Royal Prussian Society of Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., & Sol, D. (2004). Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 63, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Povinelli, D. J., & Bering, J. M. (2002). The Mentality of Apes revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 115–119.Google Scholar
  8. Raby, C. R., Alexis, D. M., Dickinson, A., & Clayton, N. S. (2007). Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature, 445, 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Salwiczek, L. H., Watanabe, A., & Clayton, N. S. (2010). Ten years of research into avian models of episodic-like memory and its implications for developmental and comparative cognition. Behavioural Brain Research, 215, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sulikowski, D., & Burke, D. (2015). From the lab to the world: The paradigmatic assumption and the functional cognition of avian foraging. Current Zoology, 61, 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor, A. H. (2014). Corvid cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perception and Performance Research Group, School of PsychologyCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Todd K. Shackelford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA