Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Incest

  • Sujita Kumar KarEmail author
  • Rajanikanta Swain
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1996-1

Synonyms

Definition

It is defined as the sexual activity between individuals who are genetically related.

Introduction

Incest is considered a taboo sexual activity. Incest is derived from Latin word incestus which means unchaste. It is defined as “any sexual activity between close blood relatives who are forbidden by law to marry” (Kellogg 2005). The Cambridge English Dictionary also defines incest as “sexual activity involving people who are closely related and not legally allowed to marry” (Dictionary 2017). It is a worldwide neglected social issue both in developed and developing countries. As per a recent data from developing countries like India, nearly three out of ten registered cases of rape are due to incest, and it follows an increasing trend (Verma et al. 2017). Considering its rising trend, importance, and impact on the society, WHO classifies it as a silent health emergency (Organization 2004) and is underreported because of social taboo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Antfolk, J. (2014). Incest aversion: The evolutionary roots of individual regulation. Psykologi; Institutionen för psykologi och logopedi; Åbo Akademi. Åbo, Finland.Google Scholar
  2. Courtois, C. A. (1997). Healing the incest wound: A treatment update with attention to recovered-memory issues. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(4), 464–496.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1997.51.4.464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dictionary, C. (2017). Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary & thesaurus. Obtenido de http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gourmet.
  4. Fontes, L. A., & Plummer, C. (2010). Cultural issues in disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 19(5), 491–518.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.512520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamamy, H. (2012). Consanguineous marriages: Preconception consultation in primary health care settings. Journal of Community Genetics, 3(3), 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herman, J. (1981). Father–daughter incest. Professional Psychology, 12(1), 76–80.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.12.1.76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Holanda Júnior, F. W. N. (2017). Incest avoidance and prohibition: Psychobiological and cultural factors. Psicologia USP, 28(2), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kellogg, N. (2005). The evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics, 116(2), 506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maguire, A., Tseliou, F., & O’reilly, D. (2018). Consanguineous marriage and the psychopathology of progeny: A population-wide data linkage study. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(5), 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Modi, R.B.J.P. (2011) A textbook of Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. 24th edition. Wadhwa, Nagpur: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
  11. Morehead, D. (1999). Oedipus, Darwin, and Freud: One big, happy family? The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 68(3), 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oosten, J. G. (2015). The war of the gods (RLE Myth): The social code in Indo-European mythology. Routledge; New York.Google Scholar
  13. Organization, W. H. (2004). Child sexual abuse: A silent health emergency. Report of the regional director for Africa. Brazzaville: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  14. Rudan, I., Rudan, D., Campbell, H., Carothers, A., Wright, A., Smolej-Narancic, N., … Deka, R. (2003). Inbreeding and risk of late onset complex disease. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40(12), 925–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sariola, H., & Uutela, A. (1996). The prevalence and context of incest abuse in Finland. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(9), 843–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Serrano, A. C., & Gunzburger, D. W. (1983). An historical perspective of incest. International Journal of Family Therapy, 5(2), 70–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00924434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shawky, R. M., Elsayed, S. M., Zaki, M. E., Nour El-Din, S. M., & Kamal, F. M. (2013). Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, 14(2), 157–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmhg.2013.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Super, M. (1981). Children born as a result of incest. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 282(6269), 1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Verma, A., Qureshi, H., & Kim, J. Y. (2017). Exploring the trend of violence against women in India. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 41(1–2), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weinberg, S. K. (1955). Incest behavior. In Incest behavior. Secaucus: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wolf, A. P. (2015). Incest prohibition, origin and evolution of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edn, pp. 730–731).  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.81054-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yildirim, A., Ozer, E., Bozkurt, H., Ozsoy, S., Enginyurt, O., Evcuman, D., … Kuyucu, Y. E. (2014). Evaluation of social and demographic characteristics of incest cases in a university hospital in Turkey. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 20, 693–697.  https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryKing George’s Medical UniversityLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forensic medicine & toxicologySCB Medical CollegeCuttackIndia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Joseph A. Camilleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Westfield State UniversityWestfieldUSA