Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Problem of Cheating

  • Jacob DyeEmail author
  • Ethan Solomon
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1210-1

Synonyms

Definition

Cheating is a strategy or behavior that exploits social agreements of cooperation; from a genetic fitness perspective, cheating benefits the cheat while causing detriment to the cooperator.

Introduction

Cheats or free-riders are organisms that take advantage of the cooperative social behaviors of other organisms either within or outside of their species in order to obtain resources and/or mating opportunities while incurring less cost than would normally be associated with their acquisition. Ghoul et al. (2014, p. 319) define cheating as “(i) a trait that is beneficial to a cheat and costly to a cooperator in terms of inclusive fitness (ii) when these benefits and costs arise from the actor directing a cooperative behavior toward the cheat, rather than the intended recipient.” However, the term “cheat” has been used somewhat inconsistently throughout the evolutionary and ecological literature leading some researchers to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Book, A. S., Quinsey, V. L., & Langford, D. (2007). Psychopathy and the perception of affect and vulnerability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(4), 531–544.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854806293554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buller, D. J. (2005). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor’s new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6), 277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, D. (2014). Why isn’t everyone an evolutionary psychologist? Frontiers in Psychology, 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00910.
  4. Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462(7269), 51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cosmides, L., Barrett, H. C., & Tooby, J. (2010). Adaptive specializations, social exchange, and the evolution of human intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Supplement_2), 9007–9014.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914623107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior (2nd ed.). Boston: Willard Grant Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish Gene (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979). The evolution of adaptation by natural selection. Biological Sciences, 205, 489–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas, A. E. (2008). Conflict, cheats and the persistence of symbioses. New Phytologist, 177(4), 849–858.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02326.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2586885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gervais, M. M., Kline, M., Ludmer, M., George, R., & Manson, J. H. (2013). The strategy of psychopathy: Primary psychopathic traits predict defection on low-value relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1757).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghoul, M., Griffin, A. S., & West, S. A. (2014). Toward an evolutionary definition of cheating. Evolution, 68(2), 318–331.  https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Alt, B., & Jekel, M. (2012). Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 975–984.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212440887.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gollwitzer, M., Süssenbach, P., & Hannuschke, M. (2015). Victimization experiences and the stabilization of victim sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73(3), 407–420.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01823.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical evolution of social behavior II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790427-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, M. (1998). Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  20. Manktelow, K. I., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect? British Journal of Psychology, 70(4), 477–488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb01720.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maynard Smith, J. (1974). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 209–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(3), 523–599.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nesse, R. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1(3), 261–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733986.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Price, M. E., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 203–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00093-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., & Price, M. E. (2006). Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: The evolutionary roots of organizational behavior. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(2–3), 103–129.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.  https://doi.org/10.1086/406755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trivers, R. (1985). Social Evolution. California: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company..Google Scholar
  28. Verplaetse, J., Vanneste, S., & Braeckman, J. (2007). You can judge a book by its cover: The sequel. A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746808400161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jaimie Arona Krems
    • 1
  1. 1.Oklamoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA