Encyclopedia of Bioastronautics

Living Edition
| Editors: Laurence R. Young, Jeffrey P. Sutton

Space Radiation: Central Nervous System Risks

  • Gregory A. NelsonEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10152-1_84-1

Definitions

CNS

The central nervous system which consists of the brain, spinal cord, and retina.

Dose

The energy absorbed per unit mass in units of gray (Gy) where 1 Gy = 1 J/kg.

Hippocampus

A region of the brain in the temporal lobe associated with learning and memory. It has a well-defined layered anatomy that facilitates electrophysiological studies and is associated with numerous animal behavioral tests.

HZE

High charge (= atomic number, Z) energetic particles.

LET or linear energy transfer

The energy deposited per unit length of a charged particle’s track and is proportional to Z2/v2 where Z is the charge and v is the velocity.

LTP

Long-term potentiation, a long-term elevation of synaptic strength in response to stimulation, which represents a tissue-level analog to memory trace formation.

MeV or million electron volts

The energy acquired by an electron moving across a voltage of 106 V and, when divided by the mass of a particle in atomic mass units (amu, u or n), is the standard energy unit reported for charged particles. Particles of the same energy/n have the same velocity.

Track

The linear pattern of energy deposition events and resultant reactive chemical species resulting from the passage of a charged particle through matter.

Introduction

An emerging human health concern for space travel is the potential for deleterious effects of space radiation on the central nervous system (CNS). This might be manifest as changes in cognition, memory, vigilance or attention, reaction time, processing speed, motor function, mood and emotional control, and social interactions, all of which contribute to normal performance and behavior. Traditionally radiation biology has treated the brain as a radiation-resistant tissue. This is based largely on the fact that neurons, the principal functional units in the brain, generally do not divide in adults; therefore, replication of DNA and the possibility of mutation and mitosis-associated cell death are minimized. Also, clinical observations from radiation therapy of the head, neck, and spine show that gross tissue damage, based on traditional pathology methods, requires very large doses (e.g., >40 Gy) and is not manifested for many months after exposure (Tofilon and Fike 2000). For comparison, the cumulative background radiation dose per year at the surface of the earth (neglecting medical exposure) is about 0.004 Gy. However, over the last two decades, evidence has accumulated at an accelerating pace which shows that statistically significant structural and functional changes occur in experimental animals exposed to radiation doses similar to those expected for long-duration space missions (e.g., about 1 Gy received over a 2–3-year Mars mission). This is especially true if the radiation consists of high-energy charged particles (HZE particles) such as those that comprise galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events (Durante and Cucinotta 2011).

Estimating the radiation risks for humans based on animal models is problematic for a number of reasons. First, there is very little epidemiological data for humans exposed chronically to radiation, and there is essentially no data for charged particles. Second, the structure of the human brain is different than that of rodent models in terms of size, neuronal pathways, and cell composition. Third, human populations are genetically outbred with much genetic diversity, whereas most laboratory animals are inbred and may exhibit limited or exaggerated responses. Therefore, interindividual differences may increase the range and variability of human responses. Fourth, the behavioral repertoire of humans far exceeds that of experimental animals, and they may possess more adaptive or compensatory capacity to deal with damage. Finally, there are no accepted standards for what defines a “significant impairment,” but the high-performance levels necessary for spaceflight operations may be susceptible to radiation damage at doses well below those that rise to clinical significance, such as the “mild cognitive impairments” of early stage neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease. With these caveats in mind, we will discuss what effects on the CNS have been observed with low doses of radiation, with emphasis on space-like charged particles.

The CNS consists of the brain, spinal cord, and retina and is made up of neurons organized into layers and columns, glial cells, and vasculature (Kandel et al. 2000). The cerebral cortex comprises the largest part of the human brain and contains about 20 billion neurons sustained by 100–200 billion glial cells. Neurons display a variety of sizes, shapes, and connectivity patterns and employ a variety of chemical neurotransmitters and receptors. Each neuron is organized into a cell body, a dendritic tree, and an axon. The dendritic tree and cell body receive signals from other neurons, while the axon is the transmission structure. Dendrites are highly branched processes covered with small projections or spines, the sites of most synapses – the specialized connections between neurons. Axons are thin fibers that extend from the cell bodies for long distances and branch at their termini where swellings contain synapses. Synapses are 1 μm-sized structures with a presynaptic component (from an axon) and a postsynaptic component (from a dendritic spine) separated by a thin space. Neurotransmission is the process by which an electrochemical signal (action potential) is transferred across the synaptic space by a chemical messenger that initiates electrochemical signals in the recipient cell. It involves voltage changes, ion movements, neurotransmitter release, and neurotransmitter binding to specific receptors on the postsynaptic membrane. Neurotransmitters include acetylcholine, glutamic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid, norepinephrine, serotonin, dopamine, and other substances. The glia (astrocytes, oligodendroglia, and microglia) are supporting cells which provide a scaffold, cooperate with the vasculature, regulate extracellular concentrations of neurotransmitters, and mediate inflammatory responses (Kandel et al. 2000).

Space radiation is dominated by high-energy protons, helium nuclei, and nuclei of other elements up to iron. They deposit their energy along dense ionization trails or tracks of less than a micron diameter but ranges of many centimeters (Durante and Cucinotta 2011). A measure of the density of the track is given by the parameter LET (linear energy transfer). The primary particles also scatter electrons (delta rays) from the material they traverse to as much as a centimeter away but proportional to track radius−2. Consequently, the energetic charged particles concentrate their damage in small volumes (e.g., cells, dendrites, synapses) which receive large local doses despite low macroscopic doses at the tissue level. Many cells in a layer or column that may be functionally coupled in a circuit could simultaneously be traversed by an HZE particle within a microsecond leading to unique responses such as the light flashes observed by astronauts. By contrast, gamma rays and x-rays deposit their energy in relatively uniform, diffuse patterns with smaller local doses. Space radiation researchers are concerned with how radiation effects depend on track structure as well as dose, which is proportional to the LET times the fluence (fluence is the number of particles passing through a unit area, cf. Nelson 2009) in order to understand the impacts of the complex mixture of particle species and energies in space. Estimates of the number of particles passing through brain structures suggest that for all cosmic ray particles, the hippocampus will be traversed by about 1.1 × 107 particles per day behind 10 g/cm2 of shielding material of which only 1022 are particles with Z >10 (Cucinotta et al. 2014). Most of the fluence will consist of protons and helium nuclei. Figure 1 below illustrates the traversal of a 200 MeV/n iron ion track through a region of the hippocampus.
Fig. 1

Model predictions of energy depositions from 56Fe (200 MeV/u) particle track energy deposition in mouse granule neurons. (Panel a) Track structure of energy deposition in layer of five neuron cells. (Panel b) Energy deposition in dendritic tree of a single neuron showing the spectrum of energy deposited, e in 20 × 20 × 20 nm voxels with blue, e < 20 eV, yellow 20 < e < 100 eV, and red e > 100 eV. The diameters of dendritic branches are between ∼1.4 and 2 μm. The dendrites are digitized as green connected cylindrical segments with topological neuron data as archived at NeuroMorpho.org. The rendered volume in these figures are 80 × 70 × 43 μm3with the neuron structures and particle tracks each represented by 20 × 20 × 20 nm3 voxels. (Reproduced with permission from Cucinotta et al. 2014. Elsevier)

Neurogenesis

A little over 15 years ago, it was recognized that there are proliferating populations of cells in the adult brain that can differentiate into neurons even into old age. The linings of the ventricles and the dentate gyrus (DG) region of the hippocampus, a structure associated with learning and memory, contain stemlike cells (neural precursor cells or NPC) that can proliferate and differentiate into neurons as well as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes – this process is neurogenesis. Newly born neurons can preferentially incorporate into neuronal circuits that are highly interconnected and likely contribute to memory formation. It was found that NPCs are the most radiation-sensitive cells in the brain with respect to survival and undergo cell death after doses as low as 0.5 Gy; surviving cells may exhibit altered differentiation patterns below 0.25 Gy. Importantly, inhibition of neurogenesis is associated with cognitive impairment in animals. The metabolic status of the tissue regulates neurogenesis, and conditions of oxidative stress impair neurogenesis. Doses less than 0.1 Gy of charged particles can elicit rapid onset of oxidative stress (4 h) in cultured NPCs which can persist for many weeks. In genetically modified animals with decreased or enhanced antioxidant capacity, radiation-induced impairment of neurogenesis is accentuated or blocked, respectively, suggesting that diets or pharmaceuticals that act as antioxidants may prove to be effective mitigators or countermeasures for radiation-induced damage. Other conditions such as emotional depression and social stress can also inhibit neurogenesis, while environmental enrichment and voluntary exercise can enhance it. The magnitude of the contribution of neurogenesis to overall cognition in humans is still unresolved.

Neuronal Structure

Recent studies have shown that neuron structure undergoes dramatic remodeling following exposure to radiation. This consists of reductions in the number of dendritic branches and dendritic spines. In one study (Parihar et al. 2015), doses of oxygen and titanium ions as low as 0.05 Gy resulted in ≈30% reductions in spine density (spines per unit dendrite length) at 10 and 30 days post-irradiation in the medial prefrontal cortex of mice as illustrated below in Fig. 2 based on high-resolution microscopy of green fluorescent protein-expressing neurons in transgenic mice.
Fig. 2

Reductions in dendritic spine density in the mPFC after HZE particle exposure. Representative digital images of 3D reconstructed dendritic segments (green) containing spines (red) in unirradiated (top left panel) and irradiated (bottom panels) brains. Dendritic spine number (left bar chart) and density (right bar chart) are quantified in charged particle-exposed animals 8 weeks after exposure. * P = 0.05, ** P = 0.01, ANOVA. (Reproduced with permission from Parihar et al. 2015. © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Levels of synaptic proteins such as synaptophysin and PSD95 also show alterations. High-dose experiments suggest that this may occur within less than an hour. In cultured mouse neurons, molecular signaling pathways involving Rho family GTPases (known to regulate synaptic cytoskeletal proteins such as cofilin) are modified within 4–24 h after 1 Gy of gamma ray exposure (Kempf et al. 2014) which might provide a molecular explanation for the remodeling. Alterations in microglial cell activities might also play a role, as microglia are known to regulate spine numbers on an ongoing basis. The implications of these observations are that the number of synapses and the complexity of neuron interconnection will be reduced after space-like doses of radiation which may lead to impaired computational activities in neuronal circuits.

Accompanying changes in neuronal structure are long-term alterations in microvessel numbers and connectivity such that 0.5–1 Gy exposures can reduce hippocampal capillary numbers and vessel length densities by >30% which is a level expected to produce local hypoxia and impaired tissue function. These changes are progressive for 9–12 months with recovery at later times (Mao et al. 2010). There is evidence that capillary barrier function can be compromised by low doses (0.1–0.75 Gy) of iron ions which could compromise the isolation of the brain from the peripheral immune system by the blood-brain barrier. Evidence for widespread tissue structure changes without necrotic changes comes from magnetic resonance imaging (Huang et al. 2010).

Electrophysiology

Electrophysiological experiments with low doses of charged particles have examined neuronal functional responses from weeks to months after irradiation and have found that both intrinsic properties of cells and their synaptic connections change. The main models for these measurements are acute brain slices prepared from mouse and rat cortex and hippocampus. In these preparations, freshly isolated 300–400-μm-thick slices of tissue from irradiated animals are kept in well-oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid which preserves living neuronal networks for up to 0.5 day. Pairs of stimulating and recording electrodes or microelectrode arrays positioned at the slice surface then record from groups of several hundred neurons (field recordings), or, alternatively, single neurons are targeted with microelectrodes (patch clamp recordings). Batteries of stimulation-recording sequences measure voltage and current changes associated with ion movements in and out of the cells (usually Na+, K+, Ca++, and Cl) controlled by specific ion channels whose open/closed state depends on the binding of neurotransmitters (receptor-gated ion channels).

Results of single-cell recordings in acute slices from animals exposed to charged particles at doses ≤1 Gy show that membrane properties such as resting membrane potential and input resistance are reduced, resulting in impaired cell excitability (Sokolova et al. 2015). Computer modeling suggests that these small changes can alter rhythmic firing patterns throughout the neural network. Synaptic plasticity (the ability of synapses to strengthen their connections in response to stimulus) may be impaired in excitatory or inhibitory neurons as measured by extracellular recordings of postsynaptic potentials. Importantly, the long-term potentiation (LTP) parameter, which reflects stable synaptic strengthening after repeated high-frequency (tetanic) stimulations, is reduced in the CA1 (cornu ammonis 1) region of the hippocampus but may be increased in the dentate gyrus, reflecting the regional differences in CNS architecture and cell composition as well as relative baseline inhibitory versus excitatory neuron activity (Vlkolinsky et al. 2007). Figure 3 below illustrates inhibition of LTP in the CA1 region by 2 Gy of iron ions. (fEPSP refers to field excitatory postsynaptic potentials measured in dendrites after stimulation of upstream axons.) LTP is considered a tissue-level model of memory trace formation which requires selective synaptic strengthening, and inhibition of LTP would reflect an impairment of memory formation capacity.
Fig. 3

Effect of 56Fe-particle radiation on synaptic plasticity. In slices from control mice, high-frequency stimulation induced prominent LTP of the dendritic fEPSP slope. The early phase of the fEPSP enhancement is post-tetanic potentiation (PTP); the later phase is LTP. Compared to non-irradiated controls, the dose of 2 Gy had a significant inhibitory effect on the magnitude of LTP (one-way ANOVA, P <0.05). (Reproduced with permission from Vlkolinský et al. 2007. © 2018 Radiation Research Society)

Evidence suggests that both pre- and postsynaptic remodelings occur. Taken together electrophysiology measurements point to impairment of neuronal excitability as well as synaptic remodeling and stable strengthening which could lead to impaired information processing and altered behaviors. Other experiments find that effects on electrophysiological parameters are radiation species dependent with complex relationships to LET, and responses from different ions at equal doses can even be opposing. Finally, behavioral training and peripheral immune function can influence the effects of radiation exposure.

Molecular Changes

A variety of biochemical measurements have shown that the metabolic status of the brain changes after irradiation. Multiple observations indicate that there is a persistent elevation of oxidative stress with alterations in enzymes such as superoxide dismutases, catalase, and glutathione peroxidases. There is an elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tissue necrosis factor-α, interleukin 1β, and interleukin 6 (Tofilon and Fike 2000; Morganti et al. 2014). This is accompanied by increases in levels in microglia and astrocyte activation markers (e.g., CD68, GFAP). Infiltration of the brain by peripheral monocytes and T lymphocytes occurs at higher doses, and there can be a decrease in microvascular adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 (Sweet et al. 2014). Glutamate-gated ion channel levels are altered, while GABA-gated channels remain stable (Machida et al. 2010; Marty et al. 2014). Acetylcholine and dopamine pathway enzymes and metabolites show alterations. Transcription profiling and proteomic analysis indicate changes in a multitude of genes associated with neurotrophic functions, cell survival, synaptic composition, DNA repair, regulation of ion channels, and behavioral activation (e.g., Kempf et al. 2014; Lowe et al. 2009). These changes have been observed for gamma rays and a number of ions at doses well below 1 Gy and are dependent on dose, dose rate, and radiation species. Thus radiation exposure is implicated in a wide number of brain tissue functions and regulatory networks that collectively will determine its functional status.

Late Neurodegeneration

In addition to radiation effects that may manifest at time intervals corresponding to space missions (acute effects), there may be radiation-induced changes that can exacerbate or accelerate the development of late neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease. Several investigators have used genetically modified mouse strains expressing mutant human genes associated with disease processes to test this notion. Thus, in mice expressing human amyloid precursor protein, Alzheimer-like pathology develops with time and may include amyloid and tau protein deposits, decrements in electrophysiological parameters, and cognitive decline in excess of normal aging. Cherry et al. (2012) demonstrated that iron ion exposures of 0.1 or 1 Gy led to cognitive decline (novel object recognition and contextual fear conditioning, see below) in the APP/PS1 mouse model after 6 months. Male but not female animals showed an accelerated accumulation of amyloid deposits in the cortex. Vlkolinsky et al. (2010), using the APP23 mouse, found early onset of synaptic transmission defects 9 months after iron ion exposure. This suggests that radiation may initiate or promote conditions leading to pathological events related to Alzheimer’s disease.

Behavior

A wide variety of behavioral tests have been employed with mice and rats to interrogate the effects of low-dose radiation on the CNS. Behavior represents the output of the CNS in response to environmental stimuli and integrates all of the interactions of cells, their structure, connectivity, microenvironment, metabolic status, and status of molecular pathways. Because information processing is distributed between many regions of the brain, it is difficult to assign behaviors to particular anatomical sites, but ablation studies have allowed mapping of regions required (but not sufficient) for the expression of behaviors. Thus, crudely, the frontal cortex is associated with attentional status and executive functions, the hippocampus is implicated in memory and learning, the amygdala is associated with fear and anxiety, and the cerebellum is associated with motor control. Behavioral effects are difficult to quantify and, in addition to the test treatment, are dependent on animal species, genotype, sex, age of exposure, specific test used, time of analysis post treatment, and any sources of stress. Despite these potential sources of interference, whole body or head-only irradiation reliably elicits quantifiable behavioral changes in rodents at doses ≥0.25 Gy which may appear acutely or develop over many months. The most sensitive tests reportedly are capable of detecting statistically significant effects at doses below 0.05 Gy. Many different types of radiation have been investigated including x-rays and gamma rays, neutrons, and charged particles of Z = 1, 6, 8, 14, 20, and 26 over a broad range of energies similar to those comprising the space environment.

One of the earliest tests used was conditioned taste aversion, which is a form of classical conditioning that assesses avoidance behavior to a normally acceptable food. Rabin and colleagues (1991) demonstrated impairment of conditioned taste aversion at doses ≥0.2 Gy in rats and found a weak dependence on particle LET. The operant conditioning test (involving lever presses for food rewards) measures effects of positive motivation and sensitivity to environmental stimuli in modifying voluntary behaviors and involves dopamine pathways related to reward. Detection limits for impairments varied from 0.25 to 2 Gy depending on ion type, and older rats were more sensitive than younger animals (Rabin et al. 2012). Mazes (usually Morris water maze or Barnes maze) have been the most widely employed tests and are often used as indicators of hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory. They have an element of fear motivation to avoid bright lights, noise, or swimming and require assessment of distal visual cues to find repositionable escape holes or platforms. Early studies demonstrated effectiveness of ≈1 Gy iron ions in impairing maze performance at 1 month post-irradiation, but more recent studies have extended this observation to lower doses of many ions. A provocative recent report by Britten et al. (2012) using the Barnes maze with young rats demonstrated that low doses (0.2–0.6 Gy) of 1000 MeV/n iron particles were effective in impairing the ability of the animals to find the escape hole. Figure 4 below illustrates the findings.
Fig. 4

Effect of 1 GeV/u 56Fe-particle radiation on the relative escape latency. Figure shows the relative escape latency time (day 3/day 1 escape latency times), REL (D3/D1), of rats exposed to 0 (open bar), 20 (solid bar), 40 (cross-hatched bar), and 60 (diagonally hatched bar) cGy of 1 GeV/u 56Fe particles. Values are means ± SEM. *P <0.05 compared to unirradiated population, analyzed by two-tailed Mann-Whitney test. (Reproduced with permission from Britten et al. 2012. © 2018 Radiation Research Society)

Here increased time to find the escape hole (escape latency) indicates poorer performance. The surprising result found by the investigators was that as much as 40-fold higher doses of x-rays were required to impair performance (≥8 Gy) illustrating the difference between more effective structured versus less effective unstructured energy deposition.

Another test which combines spatial memory and fear motivation is contextual fear conditioning in which animals are trained to expect a foot shock after a sound cue when placed in a particular visual and olfactory environment. After training, when the sound cue is delivered in either the same or a different test chamber, the “freezing” fear response assesses the association of the environment (context) with the cue. Raber and collaborators have demonstrated decrements in contextual freezing after ≥0.5 Gy of iron ions and a peak effectiveness of 0.25 Gy with silicon ions (Raber et al. 2014). They have also used this test to demonstrate dependence of radiation effects on mouse strain, sex, age, and an association with behaviorally induced Arc gene expression. Contextual freezing is dependent on the hippocampus, amygdala, and frontal cortex.

Novel object recognition (NOR) or novel object location (NOL) tests measure the relative time an animal spends exploring a new object placed in a test arena, or an old object placed in a new location, after learning the identities and positions of two identical objects in fixed locations. The tests require association of the object identities with distant visual cues and involve the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. The tests have detected impairments at doses as low as 0.1 Gy in many independent laboratories. The lowest reported effective doses were by Parihar et al. (2015) using 0.05–0.3 Gy of accelerated oxygen and titanium particles.

Two complex tasks of executive functioning in rats have been used by Britten et al. (2014) and Davis et al. (2014). These are the attentional set shift and psychomotor vigilance tests, respectively, which measure abilities of animals to maintain attention on a task, their reaction times, and impulsivity. These tests demonstrated impairments at doses ≥0.15 or ≥0.25 Gy. Importantly the experiments demonstrated that animals naturally sorted into high- and low-performing groups and high- and low-sensitivity groups. This is important as astronauts are high-performing individuals and tests based on population averages may miss important behavioral changes due to interindividual differences.

Human and Nonhuman Primate Data

Controlled experiments with nonhuman primates would be valuable in extrapolating results from rodent models to animals with brain structure and function more closely resembling humans. Unfortunately there is a paucity of such data for low-dose radiation exposures. Many high-dose tests with macaques and chimpanzees were conducted in the 1950s and 1960s to understand effects of radiation in the context of nuclear weapons (Mickley et al. 1989). Behavioral impairments were seen in these test subjects but the confounding health effects limit their value. Recent experiments with rhesus macaques designed to understand side effects of radiotherapy have shown behavioral impairments after cumulative fractionated head-only irradiation doses of ≈40 Gy (Robbins et al. 2011). However, none of the tests used charged particles.

Human exposures to radiation rely in large part on observations of atomic bomb victims or radiation accidents and are largely limited to gamma ray exposures. No increases in dementia associated with A-bomb radiation exposure to adults have been detected (Yamada et al. 2009), but children exposed in utero have exhibited mental retardation. Armstrong et al. (2013) have determined that adult survivors of childhood irradiation for acute lymphocytic leukemia exhibit impairments in cognitive processing speed, memory, attention, and learning. However, developing brains with massive cell proliferation do not reflect the condition of adults. Workers at the Chernobyl power plant accident have been reported to exhibit elevated incidence of psychiatric disorders and altered electroencephalograph patterns (Loganovsky and Yuryev 2001).

While these observations indicate a susceptibility of humans to radiation exposure for CNS function, they are mostly uncontrolled exposures with confounding environmental stresses. Modeling of pathophysiological processes common to humans and experimental animals and impacted by radiation will be needed to extrapolate experimental results to humans. Carefully conducted, humane experiments with nonhuman primates exposed to low doses of charged particles would also facilitate understanding the results from rodent models in the context of space-like radiation exposures in humans.

Summary

Doses of radiation at or below 1 Gy, commensurate with exposures expected on long-duration space missions outside LEO, have been demonstrated to cause a number of structural and functional changes in mammalian central nervous systems. The structural changes include inhibition of neurogenesis, reduction of dendrite complexity and dendritic spine numbers, reversible reductions in the number of microvessel segments and endothelial cells, and widespread altered contrast features detectable by magnetic resonance imaging. Inflammatory responses and persistent oxidative stress alter the tissue microenvironment and may present nonpermissive conditions for many processes. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels are elevated, while enzymes involved in free radical detoxification and DNA repair show transient increases. Electrochemical properties of neuronal membranes show alterations, and the capacity of synapses to adjust to stimuli (plasticity) is impaired. Receptor ion channel levels show alterations, as do pre- and postsynaptic components such as synaptophysin, PSD95, and neural cell adhesion molecule. Gene expression and protein expression profiles indicate dose- and radiation-type-dependent changes for genes involved in cell survival, differentiation, and regulation of cytoskeleton and ion channels. A number of behavioral tests interrogating cognition, memory, learning, anxiety, reaction time, and ability to maintain attention can be impaired. These responses are modulated by genotype, sex, and age and show important interindividual variations. Finally, using transgenic mouse models, radiation exposure was observed to accelerate the development of pathophysiological changes associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Together, these observations speak to impairments in functional components at molecular, cellular, and system levels resulting in cognitive and performance deficits and make a credible argument for potential changes in humans as well, but there are many caveats.

Laboratory and accelerator experiments have delivered acute radiation exposures of a few single radiation types, while, in space, radiation exposure is highly protracted and consists of complex radiation mixtures. Dose rates are known to have large influence on outcome measures following irradiation. Animal experiments have been limited to a few strains of mice and rats, and, for practical reasons, most work has been done with young adults. By contrast, the age of astronauts at the time of their first mission is in the late 40s. Human and primate brains are larger and more complex and differ in overall structure from rodent brains while sharing many basic features. Human populations are genetically heterogeneous, while most laboratory animals are inbred so that the contribution of interindividual differences has not been adequately assessed in the animal models. Extrapolation from rodent-based data to humans is limited by the dearth of information on nonhuman primates and human epidemiology and the near complete absence of data from charged particles.

The unique properties of the CNS and the space radiation environment together make risk estimation a formidable task. Cancer risks are based largely on mortality criteria and ultimately are linked to well-understood DNA damage in cell nuclei leading to cell death or uncontrolled growth. At low doses, cell death and proliferation play only a minor role in CNS responses, and the CNS exhibits a gradation of functional impairments rather than simple survival changes. Therefore, morbidity, quality of life, or performance criteria apply rather than mortality. At the present time, there is no widely accepted criteria for significant impairment as pertains to adequate performance in a complex work environment such as spaceflight, but these levels are probably well below those approximating clinical significance as associated with neurological diseases. Future work in estimating CNS risks from space radiation will need to organize adverse outcome findings from radiation exposure according to pathophysiological processes and pathways shared by humans and animals supported by modern systems biology approaches and modeling.

References

  1. Armstrong GT, Reddick WE, Petersen RC, Santucci A, Zhang N, Srivastava D, Ogg RJ, Hillenbrand CM, Sabin N, Krasin MJ, Kun L, Pui CH, Hudson MM, Robison LL, Krull KR (2013) Evaluation of memory impairment in aging adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:899–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Britten RA, Davis LK, Johnson AM, Keeney S, Siegel A, Sanford LD, Singletary SJ, Lonart G (2012) Low (20 cGy) doses of 1 GeV/u 56Fe-particle radiation lead to a persistent reduction in the spatial learning ability of rats. Radiat Res 177:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britten RA, Davis LK, Jewell JS, Miller VD, Hadley MM, Sanford LD, Machida M, Lonart G (2014) Exposure to mission relevant doses of 1 GeV/nucleon 56Fe particles leads to impairment of attentional set-shifting performance in socially mature rats. Radiat Res 182:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherry JD, Liu B, Frost JL, Lemere CA, Williams JP, Olschowka J, O’Banion MK (2012) Galactic cosmic radiation leads to cognitive impairment and increased Aβ plaque accumulation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 7(12):e53275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cucinotta FA, Alp M, Sulzman FM, Wang M (2014) Space radiation risks to the central nervous system. Life Sci Space Res 2:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis CM, DeCicco-Skinner KL, Roma PG, Hienz RD (2014) Individual differences in attentional deficits and dopaminergic protein levels following exposure to proton radiation. Radiat Res 181:258–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Durante M, Cucinotta FA (2011) Physical basis of radiation protection in space travel. Rev Mod Phys 83(4):1245–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang L, Smith A, Badaut J, Obenaus A (2010) Dynamic characteristics of 56Fe-particle radiation-induced alterations in the rat brain: magnetic resonance imaging and histological assessments. Radiat Res 173:729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM (2000) Principles of neural science, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Kempf SJ, Casciati A, Buratovic S, Janik D, von Toerne C, Ueffing M, Neff F, Moertl S, Stenerlöw B, Saran A, Atkinson MJ, Eriksson P, Pazzaglia S, Tapio S (2014) The cognitive defects of neonatally irradiated mice are accompanied by changed synaptic plasticity, adult neurogenesis and neuroinflammation. Mol Neurodegener 9:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loganovsky K, Yuryev K (2001) EEG patterns in persons exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of the Chernobyl accident: part 1: conventional EEG analysis. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 13:441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lowe XR, Bhattacharya S, Marchetti F, Wyrobek AJ (2009) Early brain response to low-dose radiation exposure involves molecular networks and pathways associated with cognitive function, advanced aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Radiat Res 171:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Machida M, Lonar G, Britten RA (2010) Low (60 cGy) doses of 56Fe HZE-particle radiation lead to a persistent reduction in the glutamatergic readily releasable pool in rat hippocampal synaptosomes. Radiat Res 174:618–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mao XW, Favre CJ, Fike JR, Kubinova L, Anderson ER, Campbell-Beachler M, Jones T, Smith A, Rightnar S, Nelson GA (2010) High-LET radiation-induced response of microvessels in the hippocampus. Radiat Res 173:486–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marty V, Vlkolinsky R, Minassian N, Cohen T, Nelson G, Spigelman I (2014) Radiation-induced alterations in synaptic neurotransmission of dentate granule neurons depend on the dose and species of charged particles. Radiat Res 182:653–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mickley G, Bogo V, West B (1989) Behavioral and neurophysiological changes with exposure to ionizing radiation, Ch. 7. In: Walker RI, Cerveny TJ (eds) Textbook of military medicine. Zajtchuk R (series eds) Part I. Vol. 2. Medical consequences of nuclear war. Textbook of Military Medicine Publications, Office of the Surgeon General, Falls ChurchGoogle Scholar
  17. Morganti JM, Jopson TD, Liu S, Gupta N, Rosi S (2014) Cranial irradiation alters the brain’s microenvironment and permits CCR2+ macrophage infiltration. PLoS One 9(4):e93650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson GA (2009) Neurological effects of space radiation. Gravitational Space Biol 22(2):33–38Google Scholar
  19. Parihar VK, Allen B, Tran KK, Macaraeg TG, Chu EM, Kwok SF, Chmielewski NN, Craver BM, Baulch JE, Acharya MM, Cucinotta FA, Limoli CL (2015) What happens to your brain on the way to Mars. Sci Adv 1:e1400256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raber J, Rudobeck E, Campbell-Beachler M, Allen AR, Allen B, Rosi S, Nelson GA, Ramachandran S, Turner J, Fike JR, Vlkolinsky R (2014) 28Silicon radiation-induced enhancement of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus of naive and cognitively tested mice. Radiat Res 181:362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rabin BM, Hunt WA, Joseph JA, Dalton TK, Kandasamy SB (1991) Relationship between linear energy transfer and behavioral toxicity in rats following exposure to protons and heavy particles. Radiat Res 128:216–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rabin BM, Joseph JA, Shukitt-Hale B, Carrihill-Knoll K (2012) Interaction between age of irradiation and age of testing in the disruption of operant performance using a ground-based model for exposure to cosmic rays. Age 34:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robbins ME, Bourland JD, Cline JM, Wheeler KT, Deadwyler SAA (2011) A model for assessing cognitive impairment after fractionated whole-brain irradiation in nonhuman primates. Radiat Res 175:519–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sokolova IV, Schneider CJ, Bezaire M, Soltesz I, Vlkolinsky R, Nelson GA (2015) Proton radiation alters intrinsic and synaptic properties of ca1 pyramidal neurons of the hippocampus. Radiat Res 183:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sweet T, Panda N, Hein A, Das S, Hurley S, Olschwka J, Williams J, O’Banion M (2014) Central nervous system effects of whole-body proton irradiation. Radiat Res 182:18–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tofilon PJ, Fike JR (2000) The radioresponse of the central nervous system: a dynamic process. Radiat Res 153:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vlkolinský R, Krucker T, Smith AL, Lamp TC, Nelson GA, Obenaus A (2007) Effects of lipopolysaccharide on 56Fe-particle radiation-induced impairment of synaptic plasticity in the mouse hippocampus. Radiat Res 168:462–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vlkolinsky R, Titova E, Krucker T, Chi BB, Staufenbiel M, Nelson GA, Obenaus A (2010) Exposure to (56)Fe-particle radiation accelerates electrophysiological alterations in the hippocampus of APP23 transgenic mice. Radiat Res 173:342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamada M, Kasagi F, Mimori Y, Miyachi T, Ohshita T, Sasaki H (2009) Incidence of dementia among atomic-bomb survivors – Radiation Effects Research Foundation Adult Health Study. J Neurol Sci 281:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Radiation Medicine & Basic SciencesLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kathryn D. Held
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation OncologyMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA