Cognitive Performance in Space
Cognition is the mental act or process by which knowledge is acquired, including perception, intuition, and reasoning.
Domains of Cognitive Performance
When evaluating effects of spaceflight on cognitive performance, it is helpful to consider the broader context of measuring individual differences in performance and conditions that affect performance within individuals. Multiple measures have been developed by psychologists to assess performance on a wide range of domains, and selecting which to implement within time constrains of any specific project can be daunting. Traditional tests depend heavily on general intellectual abilities (“g factor”) as reflected in the “intelligence quotient” (IQ), and those targeting specific abilities that could be affected by spaceflight require large investment of time and instrumentation (Deary and Batty 2007). Traditional psychometric theory has generally divided cognitive abilities into language-mediated or “verbal” intelligence and...
- Burrough B (1998) Dragonfly: NASA and the crisis aboard MIR. Harper Collins, MiamiGoogle Scholar
- Christensen JM, Talbot JM (1986) A review of the psychological aspects of space flight. Aviat Space Environ Med 57(3):203–212Google Scholar
- Kane RL, Short P, Sipes W, Flynn CF (2005) Development and validation of the spaceflight cognitive assessment tool for windows (WinSCAT). Aviat Space Environ Med 76(6 Suppl):B183–B191Google Scholar
- Kubis JF, McLaughlin EJ, Jackson JM, Rusnak R, McBride GH, Saxon SV (1977) Task and work performance on Skylab missions 2, 3 and 4: time and motion study – experiment M151. In: Johnston RS, Dietlein LF (eds) Biomedical results from Skylab. NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Washington, DC, pp 136–154Google Scholar
- Lezak MD (1994) Domains of behavior from a neuropsychological perspective: the whole story. Neb Symp Motiv 41:23–55Google Scholar
- Schroeder JE, Tuttle ML (1991) Investigation of possible causes for human-performance degradation during microgravity flight. NASA-JSC, Houston, p 210Google Scholar