Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games

Living Edition
| Editors: Newton Lee

Augmented Reality for Human-Robot Interaction in Industry

  • Federico Manuri
  • Francesco De Pace
  • Andrea Sanna
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_329-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Augmented reality for human-robot interaction in industry is the usage of augmented reality technologies for displaying computer-generated digital contents, correctly aligned to real objects, in order to enhance and enrich the communication interface of users, which operates robots in an industrial environment.

Introduction

The industry domain has taken advantage of augmented reality (AR) since its origin (Sutherland 1968): technicians are often involved in complex assembly, repair, or maintenance procedures, and they need to refer to instruction manuals to complete their tasks (Caudell and Mizell 1992). However, these activities often require a high cognitive load due to a continuous switch of the attention between the physical device and the paper manual (Henderson and Feiner 2007). AR can efficiently overcome this issue providing the same content in a digital form and properly...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akan, B., Çürüklü, B.: Augmented reality meets industry: interactive robot programming. In: Proceedings of SIGRAD, vol. 52, pp. 55–58. Link¨oping University Electronic Press, Vsters (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Caudell, T.P., Mizell, D.W.: Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of HICSS, vol. 2, pp. 659–669. IEEE, Kauai (1992)Google Scholar
  3. Chadalavada, R.T., Andreasson, H., Krug, R., Lilienthal, A.J.: That’s on my mind! robot to human intention communication through onboard projection on shared floor space. In: Proceedings of ECMR, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Lincolnm (2015)Google Scholar
  4. Coovert, M.D., Lee, T., Shindev, I., Sun, Y.: Spatial augmented reality as a method for a mobile robot to communicate intended movement. Computers in Human Behavior. 34, 241–248 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Pace, F., Manuri, F., Sanna, A., Zappia, D.: An augmented interface to display industrial robot faults. In: International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics, vol. 2, pp. 403–421. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  6. Foxlin, E.: Motion Tracking Requirements and Technologies. Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology, vol. 8, pp. 163–210. Mahwah, N.J.; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Henderson, S.J., Feiner, S.K.: Augmented reality for maintenance and repair (armar). Technical report, DTIC document (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Humanrobo.: TOSY Industrial Robot: Arm Robot by Humanrobo. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TI_A620-30.JPG CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en (2009)
  9. Makris, S., Tsarouchi, P., Matthaiakis, A. S., Athanasatos, A., Chatzigeorgiou, X., Stefos, M., …., Aivaliotis, S.: Dual arm robot in cooperation with humans for flexible assembly. CIRP Ann. 66(1), 13–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mateo, C., Brunete, A., Gambao, E., Hernando, M.: Hammer: an android based application for end-user industrial robot programming. In: Proceedings of MESA, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Senigallia (2014).Google Scholar
  11. Matsumaru, T.: Mobile robot with preliminary-announcement and display function of forthcoming motion using projection equipment. In: Proceedings of ROMAN, pp. 443–450. IEEE, Hatfield (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Michalos, G., Karagiannis, P., Makris, S., Tokçalar, Ö., Chryssolouris, G.: Augmented reality (AR) applications for supporting human robot interactive cooperation. Procedia CIRP. 41, 370–375 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. RoboCup.: BvOF RoboCup2013 – Junior Rescue by RoboCup2013, https://www.flickr.com/photos/robocup2013/9154255582/in/photostream/ CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (2013)
  14. Sutherland, I.E.: A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of AFIPS, pp. 757–764. ACM, San Francisco (1968)Google Scholar
  15. Vogel, C., Poggendorf, M., Walter, C., Elkmann, N.: Towards safe physical human-robot collaboration: a projection-based safety system. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 3355–3360. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Manuri
    • 1
  • Francesco De Pace
    • 1
  • Andrea Sanna
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Automatica e InformaticaPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly