Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Infinite, Renaissance Idea of

  • Valentina ZaffinoEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_934-2

Abstract

Reflection upon the infinite (apeiron in Greek, infinitum in Latin) crosses the whole history of thought and involves several fields of knowledge: philosophy itself, theology, cosmology, and logic-mathematics. The Greek term apeiron stands for something that possesses neither physical limitations nor determined qualities, an entity lacking a conceptual determination defining it (see Anaximander). During Antiquity, only few philosophers allowed for the existence of actual infinite reality; rather, Aristotle’s view of a merely potential existence of the infinite was what prevailed. From the sixteenth century onwards, astronomical discoveries challenged the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic cosmological system: the estimated distance between the center of the Earth and the last sphere grew progressively larger. This scientific advancement was joined in theology-philosophy by the thought that God, who is infinite in act, infinitely good, and the origin of the created universe, does not create finite reality. Rather, He manifests his infinite power by creating an infinite cosmos (this assumption is shared by Nicholas of Cusa and Giordano Bruno).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Antognazza, M.R. 2015. The hypercategorematic infinite. The Leibniz Review 25: 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquilecchia, G. 1993. Il dilemma matematico di Bruno tra atomismo e infinitismo. In Schede bruniane. (1959–1991), 319–326. Manziana: Vecchiarelli.Google Scholar
  3. Blum, P.R. 2004. Philosophieren in der Renaissance. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  4. Bönker-Vallon, A. 2004. I paradossi dell’infinito nel pensiero filosofico-matematico di Giordano Bruno. In La mente di Giordano Bruno, ed. F. Meroi, 163–194. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
  5. Cassirer, E. 2010. The individual and the cosmos in Renaissance philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. De Bernart, L. 2002. Numerus quodammodo infinitus. Per un approccio storico-teorico al “dilemma matematic” nella filosofia di Giordano Bruno. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
  7. Hankins, J., ed. 2007. The Cambridge companion to renaissance philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Koyré, A. 1948. Le vide et l’espace infini au XIVe siècle. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 17: 45–91.Google Scholar
  9. Koyré, A. 1973. Du monde clos à l’univers infini. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Kretzmann, N., ed. 1982. Infinity and continuity in ancient and medieval thought. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lagerlund, H., and B. Hill, eds. 2017. Routledge companion to sixteenth-century philosophy. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Lamarra, A., ed. 1990. L’infinito in Leibniz. Problemi e terminologia. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
  13. Lardic, J.M., ed. 1999. L’infini entre science et religion au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  14. Mancini, S. 2000. La sfera infinita. Identità e differenza nel pensiero di Giordano Bruno. Milano: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  15. Mondolfo, R. 1967. L’infinito nel pensiero dell’antichità classica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
  16. Spencer Hill, J. 1997. Infinity, faith, and time. Christian humanism and renaissance literature. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sweeney, L. 1992. Divine infinity in Greek and medieval thought. Frankfurt/New York: Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyPontifical Lateran UniversityRomeVatican City State

Section editors and affiliations

  • Matteo Valleriani
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany