Skip to main content

Fate, Renaissance Concept of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Abstract

The term fate (heimarmenē in Greek, fatum in Latin) can be understood in different ways. Ancient tradition sometimes likened it to the idea of chance (tyche) to signify the unfathomable force that governs cosmic events. On a more strictly philosophical level, fate indicated the unfailing causal order regulating the course of events. This order was at times identified with divine providence itself or as its subordinate, depending on whether the existence of a supernatural causality had been accepted. The concept of fate also has logical and ethical implications. It involves the possibility of moral conduct and mankind’s responsibility for it. These themes were associated by Christianity with the issue of divine grace and human predestination, both of which were extensively discussed during the Renaissance. It was at this time that several authors turned their attention to the subject of fate and its opposite, the theme of mankind’s freedom. Therefore, the debate over fate is first and foremost part of the wider discussion over predestination and free will, which was based on an ancient and late antique legacy that acquired a distinctly religious meaning with Erasmus of Rotterdam and Martin Luther. The debate mainly concerned how human behavior affected the soul’s eternal salvation and the role Christ’s grace played in the process. The issue of predestination was also crucial in the theological controversies that led to the Protestant Reformation in the sixteenth century. In addition, Renaissance philosophers argued over whether cosmic influences affected human events and whether the planets governed human life by affecting bodily fluids. This debate had a remarkable impact on the early modern age, especially on Hobbes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Hume, and the French Enlightenment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, F.P., and L. Foisneau, eds. 2002. L’efficacia della volontà nel xvi e xvii secolo. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertozzi, M., ed. 2008. Nello specchio del cielo. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola e le Disputationes contro l’astrologia divinatoria. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, P.R. 2004. Philosophieren in der Renaissance. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Hoine, P., and G. Van Riel, eds. 2014. Fate, providence and moral responsability in ancient, medieval and early modern thought. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Caro, M., et al., eds. 2014. Libero arbitrio. Storia di una controversia filosofica. Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Michelis Pintacuda, F. 2001. Tra Erasmo e Lutero. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flasch, K. 1998. Nikolaus von Kues. Geschichte einer Entwicklung. Frankfurt: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garin, E. 1983. Astrology in the renaissance: The zodiac of life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halverson, J. 1998. Peter Aureol on predestination: A challenge to late medieval thought. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, J., ed. 2007. The Cambridge companion to renaissance philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klibansky, R., et al. 1964. Saturn and melancholy. Studies in the history of natural philosophy, religion, and art. London: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knebel, S.K.W. 2000. Wille, Würfel und Wahrscheinlichkeit. Das System der moralischen Notwendigkeit in der Jesuitenscholastik 1550–1700. Hamburg: Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerlund, H., and B. Hill, eds. 2017. Routledge companion to sixteenth-century philosophy. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A.E. 1986. Iustitia Dei: A history of the Christian doctrine of justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A.E. 1987. The intellectual origins of the European reformation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas of Cusa. 2004. In Opera omnia, XVIII: Sermones III (1452–1455), ed. S. Donati et al. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, J. 1976. Determinism and free will. Anthony Collins’ “a philosophical inquiry concerning luman liberty”. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberman, H.A. 1981. Masters of the reformation: The emergence of a new intellectual climate in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. 2012. Oration on the dignity of man, ed. and trans. F. Borghesi et al. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppi, A. 1988. Fate, fortune, providence and human freedom. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, ed. C.B. Schmitt et al., 641–647. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, J.B. 1998. The invention of autonomy: A history of modern moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. 2006. Virtù rinascimentali. Genoa: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torzini, R. 2000. I labirinti del libero arbitrio. La discussione tra Erasmo e Lutero. Firenze: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wawrykow, J.P. 1995. God’s grace and human action: “Merit” in the theology of Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Zaffino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zaffino, V. (2019). Fate, Renaissance Concept of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_671-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_671-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics