Skip to main content

Immanence, Renaissance Idea Of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Immanence in Renaissance philosophy is primarily an epistemological category derived from a reading of Aristotle and the Medieval Aristotelian tradition. Immanent actions are considered operations of the soul which remain in the operating one itself and do not have a cause or effect on external matter. These immanent actions are distinguished from transient actions. The main issue for Renaissance philosophers involved determining which activities of the soul (nutrition, sensation, intellection, will) can be assessed as immanent. Immanence as a metaphysical category only emerged in the seventeenth century with Spinoza’s concept of God as causa immanens and was later extrapolated by philosophy historians, who were influenced by the philosophy of the Enlightenment and by German idealism, on the description of two originally Neoplatonic ideas: (1) the intrinsicness of the world soul in the world as the immanence of the soul in the world in connection with panpsychism and (2) the presence of the divine in the world as the immanence of God in the world in connection with pantheism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Aristotle. 2006. Metaphysics, Book Theta. Trans. Stephen Makin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, Giordano. 1989. Summa terminorum metaphysicorum. Lessico intellettuale europeo. Edited by Eugenio Canone. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, Giordano. 2002. Opere italiane. Classici italiani. Edited by Giovanni Aquilecchia. Torino: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, Giordano. 2010. Das Buch über die Monade, die Zahl und die Figur. Frankfurt 1591. Edited by Wolfgang Neuser, Michael Spang, and Erhard Wicke. Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, Marsilio. 2001. Platonic theology. Books I–IV. Edited by Michael J.B. Allen and James Hankins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goclenius, Rudolph. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Francofurti: Typis Mathiae Beckeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, Pietro. 1999. Trattato sull’ immortalità del’ anima. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, Pietro. 2012. Fragmenta super libros De anima Aristotelis. https://www.hs-augsburg.de/~harsch/Chronologia/Lspost15/Pomponatius/pom_fr12.html

  • Zabarella, Giacomo. 2016. De rebus naturalibus. Edited by José Manuel García Valverde. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Alfsvåg, Knut. 2012. Explicatio and Complicatio: On the understanding of the relationship between God and the World in the work of Nicholas Cusanus. International Journal of Systematic Theology 14 (3): 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, Benjamin. 1941. An introduction to Francesco Patrizi’s nova de universis philosophia. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1922. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, Zweiter Band. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Chene, Dennis. 1996. Physiologia: Natural philosophy in late Aristotelian and Cartesian thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Chene, Dennis. 2000. Life’s form: Late Aristotelian conceptions of the soul. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flasch, Kurt. 1998. Nikolaus von Kues. Geschichte einer Entwicklung. Vorlesungen zur Einführung in seine Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Marie I. 2014. On the meaning of “immanent activity” according to Aquinas. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 78 (4): 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, Dilwyn. 2013. Bruno: Immanence and transcendence in De la causa, Principio et Uno, Dialog II. Bruniana & Campanelliana 19 (2): 463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1964. Eight philosophers of the Italian Renaissance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecón, Mauricio. 2013. Francis Suárez on the efficiency of substantial forms. The Review of Metaphysics 67 (1): 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, Dominic, ed. 1982. Neoplatonism and Christian thought. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubini, Rocco. 2014. The other Renaissance. Italian humanism between Hegel and Heidegger. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • South, James B. 2002. Zabarella and the intentionality of sensation. Rivista di storia della filosofia 57 (1): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, Leen. 2008. Renaissance views of active perception. In Theories of perception in medieval and early modern philosophy, ed. Simo Knuuttila and Pekka Kärkkäinen, 203–224. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Peter. 2009. The Gramscian moment. Philosophy, hegemony and Marxism. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Nejeschleba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nejeschleba, T. (2019). Immanence, Renaissance Idea Of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_432-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_432-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics