Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Invention, Renaissance Idea of

  • Nicoletta GiniEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1057-2

Abstract

The recovery of ancient rhetorical sources which took place in fifteenth-century Italy went hand in hand with humanists’ concern for social and political issues. Consequently, humanists’ reappropriation of such authors as Cicero and Quintilian came to broaden Aristotle’s main achievements on rhetoric. Similarly to other practical-oriented disciplines (such as law, medicine, and moral philosophy), rhetoric provided a model for teaching and discussing. Humanists dealt with the most appropriate use of inventio as a tool for building up persuasive discourses. In doing so, they could not eschew from challenging the traditional rhetorical scheme put forward by the leading lights of classical oratory.

Later on, the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century reflection on method emphasized the eminently epistemological nature of inventio, by connecting it to the inductive type of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Agricola, Rodolphus. 1515. De inventione dialectica. Edit. a Martinus Dorpius et Alardus Amstelredamus. Leuven: Theod. Martinus Alost.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1981a. Prior analytics. In Complete works, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols, vol. 1, 39–113. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1981b. Posterior analytics. In Complete works,ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols, vol. 1, 114–166.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 1981c. Topics. In Complete works, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols, vol. 1, 167–277.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 1981d. Rhetoric. In Complete works, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols, vol. 1, 2152–2269. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Augustine of Hippo. 1995. De doctrina Christiana. Ed. and Trans. R.P.H. Green. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bacon, Francis. 1605, 2000. The advancement of learning. Ed. M. Kiernan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bacon, Francis. 1623, 1862. De dignitate et augmentis scientiarum. In The works of Francis Bacon. Ed. J.Spedding, R.L. Ellis and D.D. Heath. London: Longmans & co.Google Scholar
  9. Cicero. 1949a. Brutus. Orator. Trans. G.L. Hendrickson and H.M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cicero. 1949b. On invention. The Best Kind of Orator. Topics. Trans. H.M. Hubbell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cicero. 1954. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cicero. 2001. On the ideal orator. Trans. J.M. May and J. Wisse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Longinus. 1985. On the sublime. Trans. J.A. Arieti and J.M. Crossett. New York: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  14. Poliziano, Angelo. 2004. Silvae. Trans. C. Fantazzi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Poliziano, Angelo. 2010. Lamia. Trans. C.S. Celenza. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  16. Pseudo-Augustine. 2010. Principia rhetorices (De rhetorica liber). Turnhout: Brepols Publisher.Google Scholar
  17. Quintilian. 2001. The Orator's education. Ed. and Trans. D.A. Russell, 5 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ramus, Petrus. 1543, 1964. Dialecticae institutiones. Aristotelicae animadversiones. Repr. with Introduction by W. Risse. Stuttgart: Fromann.Google Scholar
  19. Ramus, Petrus. 1555, 1964. La Dialectique. Ed. M. Dassonville. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
  20. Tacitus. 1914. Dialogue on oratory. In Agricola. Germania. Dialogue on oratory. Trans. M. Hutton and W. Peterson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Valla, Giorgio. 1522. De expedita ratione argumentandi Libellus. In De re dialectica liber, ed. Georgi Trapexuntii. Lungduni: Antonium Vincentium.Google Scholar
  22. Valla, Lorenzo. 1962. Elegantiae linguae Latinae. In Opera omnia. 2 vols. Torino: Bottega d’Erasmo.Google Scholar
  23. Valla, Lorenzo. 2011. Dialectical disputations. Ed. and Trans. P. Copenhaver and L. Nauta. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Cantimori, Delio. 1937. Rhetoric and politics in Italian humanism. Journal of the Warburg Institute 1: 82–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, Virginia, and Ward, John (eds.). 2006. The rhetoric of Cicero in its medieval and early renaissance commentary tradition. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, Gillian Rosemary. 2002. Law and theology in the Middle Ages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Garin, Eugenio. 1969. Dialettica e retorica dal XII al XVI secolo. In Id. L’età nuova. Ricerche di storia della cultura dal XII al XVI secolo, 43–79. Napoli: Morano.Google Scholar
  5. Gilbert, Neal Ward. 1960. Renaissance concepts of method. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howell, Wilbur Samuel. 1961. Logic and rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
  7. Mack, Peter. 1993. Renaissance argument. Valla and Agricola in the traditions of rhetoric and dialectic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Murphy, James. 1983. Renaissance eloquence. Studies in the theory and practice of Renaissance rhetoric. Berkley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nauta, Lodi. 2009. Defense of common sense. Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ong, Walter. 1958. Ramus: Method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Vasoli, Cesare. 2002. La tradizione scolastica e le novità umanistiche filosofiche del tardo Trecento e del Quattrocento. In Le filosofie del Rinascimento, ed. Cesare Vasoli and Paolo Costantino Passavino, 113–132. Milano: B. Mondadori.Google Scholar
  12. Vasoli, Cesare. 2007. La dialettica e la retorica dell’Umanesimo: Invenzione e metodo nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo. Napoli: La Città del Sole.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto Scienze Umane e Sociali IRPhilScuola Normale Superiore, Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul RinascimentoFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Universuté Jean MoulinLyonFrance