Skip to main content

Intellect, Renaissance Concept of

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Following the medieval tradition, Renaissance philosophy approaches the intellect against the background of a twofold perspective, viz., an ontological and an epistemological perspective. The very problems, therefore, formulated during the Renaissance are to a great extent “medieval.” The ontological perspective focuses on the intellect’s state of being, e.g., what is the intellect and what is its relation to the human soul? The epistemological perspective concentrates on the intellect’s function or operation, e.g., how does the intellect work in order to render understanding possible? Both of these approaches are inextricably interwoven with one another. The solutions offered to these problems make use of familiar medieval currents, such as Aristotelianism, Averroism, (Neo-)platonism, Thomism, Scotism, etc. – without being, however, exclusively bound to one of them. Renaissance philosophy, moreover, considers all of these currents in order to offer a coherent picture of the intellect. Some of the main problems discussed include, among others, whether the intellect belongs to the individual soul or whether it is supra-individual; whether the soul perishes with the body or is immortal; whether intelligible species are required for understanding. Regardless of the so-called “eclectic” approaches in Renaissance philosophy, the discussions are notably shaped by the Averroist interpretation of Aristotle’s psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Ficino, Marsilio. 1959. Opera omnia. Riproduzione in fototipia a cura di M. Sancipriano, con presentazione di P.O. Kristeller [= Reprint of edition Basel 1576]. 2 vols. Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nifo, Agostino. 2011. De intellectu, ed. Leen Spruit. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, Pietro. 1990. Tractatus de immortalitate animae. Abhandlung über die Unsterblichkeit der Seele, ed. Burkhard Mojsisch. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernia, Nicoletto. 1998. Quaestiones de pluralitate intellectus contra falsam et ab omni veritate remotam opinionem Averrois et de animae felicitate. In Quaestiones. Ristampa anastatica delle rispettive edizioni originali. Premessa di E. De Bellis, 44–58. Casarano: Editrice Eurocart.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Blum, Paul Richard. 2007. The immortality of the soul. In The Cambridge companion to Renaissance philosophy, ed. James Hankins, 211–233. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brenet, Jean-Baptiste. 2003. Transferts du sujet. La noétique d’Averroès selon Jean de Jandun. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenet, Jean-Baptiste. 2008. Ame intellective, âme cogitative; Jean de Jandun et la duplex forma propria de l’homme. Vivarium 46: 318–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casini, Lorenzo. 2007. The Renaissance debate on the immortality of the soul. Pietro Pomponazzi and the plurality of substantial forms. In Mind, cognition and representation. The tradition of commentaries on Aristotle’s De anima, ed. Paul J.J.M. Bakker and Johannes M.M.H. Thijssen, 127–150. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, Ernst. 1999. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, vol. 1, ed. Tobias Berben. Darmstadt: WBG. Reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, James. 2007. Humanism, scholasticism, and Renaissance philosophy. In The Cambridge companion to Renaissance philosophy, ed. James Hankins, 30–48. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Dag N. 2004. The attraction of Averroism in the Renaissance: Vernia, Achillini, Prassicio. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Special Issue: Philosophy Science & Exegesis 47: 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kärkkäinen, Pekka and Henrik, Lagerlund. 2009. Philosophical psychology in 1500: Erfurt, Padua and Bologna. In Psychology and philosophy. Inquiries into the soul from late Scholasticism to contemporary thought, ed. Sara Heinämaa and Martina Reuter, 27–45. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keßler, Eckhard. 1988. The intellective soul. In The Cambridge history of Renaissance philosophy, ed. Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner, Eckhard Keßler, and Jill Kraye, 485–534. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keßler, Eckhard. 2008. Die Philosophie der Renaissance: Das 15. Jahrhundert. München: C. H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw. 1995. Der lateinische Averroismus im Mittelalter und in der Früh-Renaissance. In Philosophy and learning. Universities in the Middle Ages, ed. Maarten J.F.M. Hoenen, J.H. Josef Schneider, and Georg Wieland, 371–386. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinkauf, Thomas. 2001. Vernunft-Verstand. IV. Renaissance und frühe Neuzeit. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 11, ed. Joachim Ritter (†), Karlfried Gründer, and Gottfried Gabriel, 796–809. Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Emily. 1992. Averroes and the plurality of forms. Franciscan Studies 52: 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Emily. 1993. The nature and influence of late Renaissance Paduan psychology. History of Universities 12: 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Emily. 2000. Renaissance theories of soul. In Psyche and Soma: Physicians and metaphysicians on the mind-body problem from antiquity to enlightenment, ed. John P. Wright and Paul Potter, 147–172. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, Bruno. 1945. Sigeri di Brabante nel pensiero del Rinascimento italiano. Rome: Edizioni italiane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubini, Paolo. 2015. Pietro Pomponazzis Erkenntnistheorie. Naturalisierung des menschlichen Geistes im Spätaristotelismus. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Charles B. 1983. Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spruit, Leen. 1995. Species intelligibilis: From perception to knowledge: Renaissance controversies, later Scholasticism, and the elimination of the intelligible species in modern philosophy, vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanni Rovighi, Sofia. 1951. Introduzione. In Le Quaestiones de anima di Taddeo da Parma, ed. S. Vanni Rovighi. Milan: Vita e pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, M.C. 1981. Taddeo de Parme et les deux rédactions des ‘Quaestiones De anima’ de Jean de Jandun. Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum 28: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Jeschke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jeschke, T. (2019). Intellect, Renaissance Concept of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1055-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1055-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Intellect, Renaissance Concept of
    Published:
    17 October 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1055-2

  2. Original

    Intellect
    Published:
    28 January 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1055-1