Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Imagination in Renaissance Philosophy

  • Anna CorriasEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1053-1

Abstract

In the Renaissance, the imagination was considered a crucial mental power which played a key role in the building of knowledge as well as in the individual’s relationship with external reality. It was believed to act on the data of sense perception by unifying them into a single representation. This, in turn, would enable the work of reason and, as a result, the mind’s procession of the objects of knowledge. Because of its intermediate position, the imagination was also thought to convey the influence of the soul to the body and vice-versa and to account for many psycho-physiological processes, such as falling ill and recovering. It was also thought to be able to act at a distance, a concept that posed no little challenges to many philosophers of the time, from Marsilio Ficino to Francis Bacon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Literature

  1. Bacon, Francis. 1857-1874. Silva Sylvarum. In Works, 14 vols, ed. J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, and D. D. Heath. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Bruno, Giordano. 2004. In Cause, principle and Unity, and essays on magic, ed. R.J. Blackwell and R. de Lucca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Digby, Kenelm. 1664. A late discourse touching the cure of wounds by the powder of sympathy. London: Printed for JG.Google Scholar
  4. Ficino, Marsilio. 1987. El libro dell’amore, ed. S. Niccoli. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
  5. Ficino, Marsilio. 2006 (VI). Platonic Theology, trans. M.J.B. Allen and ed. J. Hankins, 6 vols, Cambridge 302 (MA) and London: I Tatti Renaissance Library, Harvard University Press. 2001–06.Google Scholar
  6. Ficino, Marsilio. 1989. Three books on life, trans. and ed. C.V. Kaske and J.R. Clark. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Ficino, Marsilio. 2002 (II). Platonic Theology, trans. M.J.B. Allen and ed. J. Hankins, 6 vols, Cambridge (MA) and London: I Tatti Renaissance Library, Harvard University Press. 2001–06.Google Scholar
  8. Ficino, Marsilio. 2004 (IV). Platonic Theology, trans. M.J.B. Allen and ed. J. Hankins, 6 vols, Cambridge (MA) and London: I Tatti Renaissance Library, Harvard University Press. 2001–06.Google Scholar
  9. Pico della Mirandola, Giovan Francesco. 1497. De morte Christi & propria cogitanda libri tres. Bologna: Benedictus Hectoris Faelli.Google Scholar
  10. Pico della Mirandola, Giovan Francesco. 1930. On the imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Pomponazzi, Pietro. 1567. De naturalium effectuum admirandorum causis sive de incantationibus. Basel: Henricpetri.Google Scholar
  12. Walker, Daniel Pickering. 2000. Spiritual and Demonic Magic: From Ficino to Campanella, University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

  1. Allen, Michael J.B. 1989. Phantastic art, magic, and the Idola. In Icastes: Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Plato’s ‘Sophist’, 168–204. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Michael J.B. 1992. Summoning plotinus: Ficino, smoke and the strangled chickens. In Reconsidering the renaissance: Papers from the twenty-first annual conference, ed. M.A. Di Cesare, 63–88. Binghamton: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Corrias, Anna. 2012. Imagination and memory in Marsilio Ficino’s theory of the vehicles of the soul. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6: 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corrias, Anna. 2013. From daemonic reason to daemonic imagination: Plotinus and Marsilio Ficino on the Soul’s tutelary Spirit. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giglioni, Guido. 2010a. The matter of the imagination: The renaissance debate over Icastic and fantastic imitation. Camenae 8: 1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Giglioni, Guido. 2010b. Fantasy Islands: Utopia, the tempest, and new Atlantis as places of controlled credulousness. In World-building and the early modern imagination, ed. A. Kavey, 91–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giglioni, Guido. 2011. Coping with inner and outer demons: Marsilio Ficino’s theory of the imagination. In Diseases of the imagination and imaginary disease in the early modern period, ed. Y. Haskell, 19–50. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hankins, James. 2005. Marsilio Ficino on Reminiscentia and the transmigration of souls. Rinascimento 45: 3–17.Google Scholar
  9. Heitzman, Marian. 1935. L’agostinismo avicennizante e il punto di partenza della filosofia di M. Ficino. Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 16: 295–322. (1936. 17: 1-11).Google Scholar
  10. Klein, Robert. 1970. L’imagination comme vêtement de l’âme chez Marsile Ficin et Giordano Bruno. In La forme et l’intelligible: Écrits sur la Renaissance et l’art modern, ed. A. Chastel, 89–124. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  11. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1943. The philosophy of Marsilio Ficino, trans. V. Conant, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lobis, Seth. 2011. Sir Kenelm Digby and the power of sympathy. Huntington Library Quarterly 74: 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mucillo, Maria. 2007. La concezione dell ‘immaginazione nel Rinascimento tra Platonismo e Aristotelismo (Marsilio Ficino e Giovan Francesco Pico della Mirandola). In La mente, il corpo e i loro enigmi, ed. G. Coccoli, A. Ludovico, C. Marrone, and F. Stella, 11–36. Rome: Stamen.Google Scholar
  14. Yates, Frances Amelia. 1966. The art of memory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.History DepartmentUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The University of QueenslandSchool of Historical and Philosophical InquiryBrisbaneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Sgarbi
    • 1
  • Peter Mack
    • 2
  1. 1.University Ca' Foscari VeniceVeniceItaly
  2. 2.The Warburg Institute, School of Advanced StudyUniversity of LondonLondonUK