Encyclopedia of Petroleum Geoscience

Living Edition
| Editors: Rasoul Sorkhabi


  • J. G. GluyasEmail author
  • G. Yuan
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02330-4_123-1


Diagenesis is the sum total of processes that occur following deposition of a sediment up to but excluding metamorphism. It includes compaction, mineral precipitation, mineral dissolution, and mineral transformation. Many of the processes contribute to lithification , the conversion of sediment into rock.


The word “diagenesis” (Greek dia meaning “passing through” and Latin genesis, “development or generation”) was first used in geology in 1868 by the German geologist Wilhelm von Gümbel. The term was refined by Johannes Walther in his work “Introduction to Geology as a Historical Science” (Einleitung in die Geologie als historische Wissenschaft, 1893–1894) and by William T. Twenhofel in Principles of Sedimentation (1939) to its current definition.

Diagenesis is key to understanding the evolution of rock composition and texture with depth, time, and temperature and to deciphering the mechanisms by which elements are cycled between the atmosphere, ocean, and crust....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aplin AC, McQuaker JHS (2011) Mudstone diversity: origin and implications for source seal and reservoir properties in petroleum systems. AAPG Bull 95:2031–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin B, Butler CO (1985) Compaction curves. AAPG Bull 69:622–626Google Scholar
  3. Bjørlykke K (2015) Petroleum geoscience: from sedimentary environments to rock physics, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg, 662 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blenkinsop TG (1998) Definition of low-grade metamorphic zones using illite crystallinity. J Metamorph Geol 6:623–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burley SD, Worden R (2003) Sandstone diagenesis: recent and ancient. Reprint series volume 4 of the International Association of Sedimentologists. Wiley, New York, 656 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark SJ (2014) Constraining diagenetic timings, processes and reservoir quality in igneous-affected basins. PhD dissertation, Durham UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies RJ, Cartwright J (2002) A fossilized opal A to opal C/T transformation on the northeast Atlantic margin: support for a significantly elevated paleogeothermal gradient during the Neogene? Basin Res 14:467–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emery D, Robinson AG (1993) Inorganic geochemistry: applications to petroleum geology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 255 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gluyas JG, Cade CA (1997) Prediction of porosity in compacted sands. In: Kupecz J, Gluyas JG, Bloch S (eds) Reservoir quality prediction in sandstones and carbonates. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, vol 69. pp 19–28Google Scholar
  10. Gluyas JG, Leonard AJ (1995) Diagenesis of the Rotliegend sandstone: the answer ain’t blowin’ in the wind. Mar Pet Geol 12:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gluyas JG, Swarbrick RE (2004) Petroleum geoscience. Blackwell, Oxford, 359 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldhammer RK (1997) Compaction and decompaction algorithms for sedimentary carbonates. J Sedimen Res A 67:26–35Google Scholar
  13. Halley RB, Schmoker JW (1983) High-porosity Cenozoic carbonate rocks of South Florida: progressive loss of porosity with depth. AAPG Bull 67:191–200Google Scholar
  14. Irwin H, Curtis CD, Coleman ML (1977) Isotopic evidence for source of diagenetic carbonates formed during burial of organic-rich sediments. Nature 269:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milliken KL, Rudnicki M, Awwiller DN, Zhang T (2012) Organic matter-hosted pore system, Marcellus formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania. AAPG Bull 97:177–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oertel G, Curtis CD (1972) Clay-ironstone concretion preserving fabrics due to progressive compaction. Geol Soc Am Bull 83:2597–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oxtoby NH, Mitchell AW, Gluyas JG (1995) The filling and emptying of the Ula oilfield: fluid inclusion constraints. In Cubitt JM, England WA (eds) The geochemistry of reservoirs. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol 86. Geological Society, London, pp 141–157Google Scholar
  18. Primmer TJ, Cade CA, Evans IJ, Gluyas JG, Hopkins MS, Oxtoby NH, Smalley PC, Warren EA, Worden RH (1997) Global patterns in regional diagenesis – their application to reservoir quality prediction for petroleum exploration. In: Kupecz JA, Gluyas J, Bloch S (eds) Reservoir quality prediction in sandstones and carbonates. AAPG memoir, vol 69. pp 61–78Google Scholar
  19. Read, JF, Horbury AD (1993) Eustacy and tectonic controls on porosity evolution beneath sequence-bounding unconformities and paeasequence disconformities on carbonate platforms. In: Horbury AD, Robinson AG (eds) Diagenesis and basin development. American Association of Petroleum Geologists studies in geology, vol 36. pp 155–198Google Scholar
  20. Robinson AG, Coleman ML, Gluyas JG (1993) The age and cause of illite cement growth, village fields area, southern North Sea: evidence from K-Ar ages and 18O/16O ages. AAPG Bull 77:68–80Google Scholar
  21. Vesic AS, Clough GW (1968) Behaviour of granular material under high stresses. J Soil Mech Found Div 94:661–688Google Scholar
  22. Walls JD, Diaz E, Derzhi N, Grader A, Dvorkin J, Arredondo S, Caprio G (2011) Eagle ford shale reservoir properties from digital rock physics, 2011 CSPG CSEG CWLS convention, http://www.cspg.org/cspg/documents/Conventions/Archives/Annual/2011/048-Eagle_Ford_Shale_Reservoir_Properties.pdf. Accessed on 21 Aug 2017
  23. Yuan G, Cao Y, Gluyas JG, Li X, Xi K, Wang Y, Jia Z, Sun P, Oxtoby NH (2015) Feldspar dissolution, authigenic clays and quartz cement in open and closed geochemical systems during diagenesis: typical examples from two rift sags in Bohai Bay, East China. AAPG Bull 99:2121–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.China University of Petroleum (Qingdao)QindaoChina