Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

LGBTQI and Queer Studies

  • Kelby HarrisonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9043

In 1995, Lauren Berlant and Michael Warner wrote that the only way to capture queer theory is through “a kind of anti-encyclopedia entry” because “queer theory is not the theory of anything in particular, and has no precise bibliographic shape.” In the nearly 20 years since Berlant and Warner’s article, queer theory has taken shape – nearly having a canon. This rapidly growing discourse of subaltern, deviant, and/or minoritized expressions of sexual desire – what we usual call lesbian, gay, bisexual, or queer – and the rapidly shifting political environment increasingly allows scholars to ask and answer such questions in public forums without risking professional reprisal.

However, the canon of queer theory is a significantly different body of literature than lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) studies, which in turn is different from LGBTI religious literature, queer theology, and LGBTI psychology. To create an encyclopedic entry of these disparate bodies of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Abelove, H., Barale, M., & Halperin, D. (Eds.). (1993). The lesbian and gay studies reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anzaldua, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  3. Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1995). What does queer theory teach us about X? PMLA, 110, 343–349.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cass, V. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: a theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castiglia, C., & Reed, C. (2011). If memory serves: Gay men, AIDS, and the promise of the queer past. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, P. S. (2011). Radical love: An introduction to queer theology. New York: Seabury Books.Google Scholar
  8. Cornwell, S. (2012). Intersex and ontology: A response to the church, women bishops and provision. Manchester: Department of Religions and Theology, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  9. D’Augelli, A., & Patterson, C. (1996). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities over the lifespan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. de Beauvoir, S. (1972). The second sex (trans: Parshley, H. M.). New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1949).Google Scholar
  11. Dean, T. (2009). Unlimited intimacy: Reflections on the subculture of barebacking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domurat Dreger, A. (1999). Intersex in the age of ethics. Hagerstown: University Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  13. Dowds, A. (2006). The velvet rage. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Goss, R. (1994). Jesus acted up: A gay and lesbian manifesto. New York: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, F. (1978). The bisexual option. Westminster: Arbor House.Google Scholar
  17. Loughlin, G. (Ed.). (2007). Queer theology: Rethinking the Western body. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Salaman, G. (2010). Assuming a body: Transgender and rhetorics of materiality. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Serano, J. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of Femininity. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  21. Shilts, R. (1987). And the band played on. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Union Theological SeminaryNew YorkUSA