Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Neurology and Psychology of Religion

  • Marsha Aileen HewittEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_9003

Recent developments within neuroscience have had a significant influence on a number of disciplines, including psychological and psychoanalytic approaches to religion, providing new evidentiary frameworks of explanation. While there is as yet no final answer to this question, many neurobiologists concur that while human experience is a product of mind and thus generated by brain activity, it would be misleading to “reduce” mind as strictly coterminous with brain function. A growing number of neurobiologists acknowledge the importance of “affect” – emotions and feelings – along with cognitively based symbolic meaning-making activity as integral to understanding the complexity of human experience (Damasio 1994, 2003; Panksepp 1998; Solms and Turnbull 2002; d’Aquili and Newberg 1993, 1998). While the psychology of religion must take seriously neurobiological accounts of mental states that are experienced and described as “mystical,” “unitive,” “ecstatic,” or “transcendent,” it is also...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. d’Aquili, E., & Newberg, A. (1993). Religious and mystical states: A neuropsychological model. Zygon, 28(2), 177–200.Google Scholar
  2. d’Aquili, E., & Newberg, L. (1998). The neuropsychological basis of religions, or why God won’t go away. Zygon, 33(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  3. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  4. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1913/2001). The claims of psychoanalysis to scientific interest. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 165–190). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1927/2001). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 5–56). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1937/2001). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 216–253). London: Vintage, the Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hayden, B. (2003). Shamans, sorcerers, and saints. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hewitt, M. A. (2012). Affective and cognitive dimensions of religious experience: Toward a conceptual/theoretical integrative perspective. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 41(1), 33–45.Google Scholar
  10. James, W. (1902/2004). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The mind in the cave: Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thanes & Hudson.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis-Williams, D., & Pearce, D. (2005). Inside the neolithic mind: Consciousness, cosmos and the realm of the Gods. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  13. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Solms, M. (1997). What is consciousness? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45, 681–703.Google Scholar
  15. Solms, M., & Neressian, E. (1999). Freud’s theory of affect: Questions for neuroscience. Neuropsychoanalysis, 1, 5–14.Google Scholar
  16. Solms, M., & Turnbull, O. (2002). The brain and the inner world: An introduction to the neuroscience of subjective experience. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  17. Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: Is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47, 1061–1106.Google Scholar
  18. Winkelman, M. (2004). Shamanism as the original neurotheology. Zygon, 39(1), 193–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trinity CollegeUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada