Winnicott, Donald Woods, and Religion
Being and the Feminine Ground
Winnicott grounds his theory on the female element of being as the center of gravity in the relationship between mother, child, and environment. “Holding” is important in that it helps the baby to integrate experience and prepares the foundation for what becomes a self-experiencing “being.” Holding, for Winnicott, refers to the mother’s capacity for identification with her infant as well as the literal physical holding of the child – feeding, bathing, and dressing – in the phase of “absolute dependence,” which includes the mother’s empathy, touch, and attentiveness to the infant’s sensitivity to falling.
Winnicott also believes that the mother should embrace the infant figuratively in her own being to prevent holding from becoming a mechanical act. Without this experience of being, the infant can feel quite empty. The baby may experience unthinkable anxiety, primitive agonies, or the experience of falling and annihilation. The baby’s subjective experience...
- Winnicott, D. W. (1958). Collected papers: Through paediatrics to psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
- Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Holding and interpretation: Fragment of an analysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
- Winnicott, D. W. (1987). Babies and their mothers. Beverly: Perseus.Google Scholar
- Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Psychoanalytic explorations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Winnicott, D. W., & Winnicott, C. (1971). Playing and reality. Kent: Tavistock.Google Scholar