Skip to main content

Zen

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

I need to repeat that Zen refuses to be explained, but that it is to be lived (Suzuki 1949, p. 310).

Limitations of Explanation

Keeping the limitations of explanation and the value placed on the primacy of experience in mind, the following will provide an outline sketch of Zen Buddhism. Zen is the Japanese translation of the Sanskrit term, dhyana, which means concentration meditation or meditative absorption. However, this linguistic definition is not completely accurate. Dhyana is typically associated with meditation on a specific object, sound, or image and implies a transcendent state. Zazen, the basic generic term for Zen meditation, functions differently depending on the specific sect and understanding of religious realization. For instance, shikantaza(just sitting, nothing but sitting) serves as the central practice of the Soto Zen lineage founded by Eihei Dogen during the thirteenth century in Japan based on teachings that he received in China. This practice is an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Abe, M. (1985). Zen and Western thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. (2010). The Zen impulse and the psychoanalytic encounter. New York: Routeledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. (2011). Total exertion: Zen, psychoanalysis, life. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(3), 592–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E., Suzuki, D. T., & DeMartino, R. (1960). Zen Buddhism and psychoanalysis. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, W. (1976). Silent music. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapleau, P. (1989). The three pillars of Zen. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, H. (1960). Psychoanalytic thought and Eastern wisdom. In J. Ehrenwald (Ed.), The history of psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (1996). Zen spirit, Christian spirit: The place of Zen in Christian life. New York: Continuum Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magid, B. (2000). Ordinary mind: Exploring the common ground of Zen and psychotherapy. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncayo, R. (2012). The signifier pointing at the moon. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, G. (1989). The foundational standpoint of Madhyamika philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, S. (1987). A mind of her own: The life of Karen Horney. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, R. (1998). Zen and the heart of psychotherapy. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stambaugh, J. (1999). The formless self. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D. T. (1949). Essays in Zen Buddhism (first series). London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen mind, beginner’s mind. New York: Weatherhill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul C. Cooper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cooper, P.C. (2020). Zen. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_760

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics