Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Psychology in the Bible

  • M. Alroy MascrengheEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200234

Religion and Psychology

Evangelicals have reacted in at least three different ways to the interaction between religion and psychology. The Hyper Orthodox group as Johnson calls them has rejected psychology outright and stressed that all knowledge of human nature should come only from the Bible. The perspectivalists tend to read the Bible for theological insights and not for psychological insights. While they agree that the Bible might indeed address some psychological issues, they do not see that as the primary purpose of the Bible. Integrationists resist a rigid separation between the Bible and psychology (Johnson 1992). Modern scholarship is bent more toward the integrationists side.

There have been two areas in the integration between psychology and the Bible. One considers how the Bible can help in psychology. Drawing insights from the Bible to help with psychology and counseling. The other considers how psychology can help in reading the Bible, using insights from psychology to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Delitzsch, F. (1869). A system of biblical psychology. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.Google Scholar
  2. Ellens, J. H., & Rollins, W. G. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and the Bible: A new way to read the scriptures. 4 Vols. Praeger perspectives. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Grant, F. C. (1970). Psychological study of the Bible. In Religions in Antiquity: Essays in memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough (pp. 104–125). Eugene: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, E. (1992). A place for the Bible within psychological science. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 20(4), 346–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kille, D. A. (2001). Psychological biblical criticism. Guides to Biblical Scholarship. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ricœur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. 6. Printing. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rollins, W. G. (1997). The Bible and psychology: New directions in biblical scholarship. Pastoral Psychology, 45(3), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rollins, W. G. (1999). Soul and psyche: The Bible in psychological perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  9. Vitz, P. C. (1993). Sigmund Freud’s Christian unconscious. Grand Rapids/Leominster: W.B. Eerdmans/Gracewing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religious StudiesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa