Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Offending and Religion

  • Belinda WinderEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200161

The term “offending” is used here to describe the commission of an illegal act. While most religions will also have religious laws or morals associated with them, this text considers acts that are against statutory laws. This entry considers a number of ways in which offending and religion may be connected.

Offending Against a Religion

First, there are laws (typically historical or at least not now actively prosecuted against by most countries) relating to blasphemy, that is insulting or showing irreverence toward another’s religion or deity(ies). Blasphemy laws were upheld by many countries in the world to protect the prevailing religious ideology against irreverent speech, behavior, or outputs (such as writing or artwork). However, the issue in modern times is that such laws typically work against freedom of speech and religious beliefs. Blasphemy laws have survived in the form of protection against hate speech. Psychological research examining predictors for seeing something as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Dunkel, C. S., & Hillard, E. E. (2014). Blasphemy or art: What art should be censored and who wants to censor it? The Journal of Psychology, 148(1), 1–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  3. Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Lemkin, R. (1945). Genocide-a modern crime. Free World, 9, 39.Google Scholar
  5. Mehta, R., & Belk, R. W. (1991). Artifacts, identity, and transition: Favorite possessions of Indians and Indian immigrants to the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 398–411.Google Scholar
  6. Saradjian, A., & Nobus, D. (2003). Cognitive distortions of religious professionals who sexually abuse children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(8), 905–923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Turley, J. (1987). Laying hands on religious racketeers: Applying Civil RICO to fraudulent religious solicitation. William & Mary Law Review, 29, 441.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sexual Offences, Crime and Misconduct Research Unit, Department of PsychologyNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK