Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Jungian Feminists

  • Vivianne CrowleyEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200080

The term “Jungian feminists” can be applied to feminist Jungian analysts and to feminist scholars of Jungian theories.

The theories of Carl Gustav Jung (1875–1961) about the psychology of women and the feminine were radical for their time, but it is important to set them in context and note that the major goal of first-wave feminism – women’s universal suffrage – was not achieved in his Swiss homeland until 10 years after his death. In Jung’s lifetime, the dominant societal view was that women were either inferior to men or “equal but different” with biologically determined spheres of influence and role.

Jung was aware that as a man there were deficiencies in his understanding of women (Jung 1927/1970, p. 117; para. 240). Nevertheless, he was often blind to his own social conditioning. Jung considered that our inner relationship with the contra-sexual “other” in the psyche – for a man his anima, for a woman her animus– was fundamental for psychological health and for constructive...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bolen, J. S. (1984). Goddesses in everywoman: A new psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  2. Bolen, J. S. (1984/2014). Gods in everyman: Archetypes that shape men’s lives. San Francisco: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Bolen, J. S. (1999/2003). The millionth circle: How to change ourselves and the world: The essential guide to women’s circles. Berkeley: Conari Press.Google Scholar
  4. Christ, C. P. (1979). Why women need the Goddess: Phenomenological, psychological, and political reflections. In C. P. Christ & J. Plaskow (Eds.), Womanspirit rising: A feminist reader in religion (pp. 273–286). San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goldenberg, N. R. (1976/1990). A feminist critique of Jung. R. L. Moore, D. J. Meckel (Eds.), Jung and Christianity in dialogue: Faith, feminism and hermeneutics (pp. 104–111). Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  7. Harding, M. E. (1935/1955/1971). Women’s mysteries ancient and modern: A psychological interpretation of the feminine principle as portrayed in myth, story and dreams. London: Rider & Company.Google Scholar
  8. Jung, C. G. (1927/1970). Women in Europe. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), The collected works of C.G. Jung, vol. 10, civilization in transition (pp. 113–133). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Jung, C. G. (1951/1968). The syzygy: Anima and animus. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), The collected works of C. G. Jung, vol. 9, part 2, Aion: researches into the phenomenology of the self (pp. 11–22). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Jung, E. (1957). Animus and anima: Two essays. Zürich: Spring Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Lauter, E., & Rupprecht, C. S. (1985). Introduction. In E. Lauter & C. S. Rupprecht (Eds.), Feminist archetypal theory: Interdisciplinary re-visons of Jungian thought (pp. 3–22). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  12. Neumann, E. (1955/1963). The Great Mother: An analysis of the archetype. (R. Manheim, Trans.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Perera, S. B. (1981). Descent to the Goddess: A way of initiation for women, studies in Jungian psychology by Jungian analysts no. 6. Toronto: Inner City Books.Google Scholar
  14. Rowland, S. (1999). C. G. Jung and literary theory: The challenge from fiction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rowland, S. (2002). Jung: A feminist revision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Samuels, A. (1997). Introduction: Jung and the post-Jungians. In P. Young-Eisendrath & T. Dawson (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Jung (pp. 1–13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ulanov, A. B. (1971). The feminine in Jungian psychology and in Christian theology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wehr, D. S. (1987/1988). Jung and feminism: Liberating archetypes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Wolff, T. (1934/1941). A few thoughts on the process of individuation in women. Spring, 81–103.Google Scholar
  20. Young-Bruehl, E. (2009). Women and children first! Modern Psychoanalysis, 34(2), 52–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cherry Hill SeminaryColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK