Advertisement

Storage Ring Design for Synchrotron Radiation Sources

  • Riccardo BartoliniEmail author
Reference work entry
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

Modern storage ring light sources have been very successful in providing high-flux, high-brightness, highly stable photon beams for many scientific applications. Their success is underpinned by sophisticated lattice designs that allow small emittance electron beams to be reached with a large complement of straight sections for insertion devices. The design of such lattices is in continuous evolution, with the most modern trends aiming at diffraction-limited storage rings.

In this chapter we review the users’ requirements and their implications on the storage ring design strategies. The rationale of the design based on double-bend achromats (DBA) and triple-bend achromats (TBA) isare presented along with the most recent solutions based on multi-bend achromats (MBA) and damping wigglers. The strategies for the optimizsation of the linear and nonlinear optics are discussed. We conclude with a review of the injection schemes, including nonlinear pulsed kicker injection and the implications of top-up operation.

Keywords

Storage Ring Design Low-Emittance Lattices Injection Systems 

References

  1. V.I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Andersson et al., Determination of a small vertical electron beam profile and emittance at the Swiss light source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A591, 437 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Aitkinson et al., Development of a nonlinear kicker system to facilitate a new injection scheme for the BESSY II storage ring, in Proceedings of the IPAC11, San Sebastian, 2011, p. 3394Google Scholar
  4. J. Bengtsson, The sextupole scheme for the Swiss Light Source (SLS): an analytical approach. SLS Note 9/97 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. K. Bane, A simplified model of intrabeam scattering, in Proceedings of the EPAC02, Paris, 2002, p. 1443Google Scholar
  6. K. Balweski et al., PETRA III upgrade, in Proceedings of the IPAC11, San Sebastian, 2011, p. 2948Google Scholar
  7. R. Bartolini, The commissioning of the diamond storage ring, in Proceedings of the PAC07, Albuquerque, 2007, p. 1109Google Scholar
  8. R. Bartolini et al., Correction of multiple nonlinear resonances in storage rings. PRSTAB 11, 104002 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. R. Bartolini et al., Calibration of the nonlinear ring model at the diamond light source. PRSTAB 14, 054003 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. M. Borland, Elegant: a flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulations. APS, LS-287, 2000Google Scholar
  11. M. Borland, Exploration of a Tevatron-sized ultimate storage ring, in Proceedings of the IPAC12, New Orleans, 2012, p. 1683Google Scholar
  12. M. Borland et al., Hybrid seven bend achromat lattice for the advanced photon source upgrade, in Proceedings of the IPAC’15, Richmond, 2015, to appearGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Bruck, Accelerateurs Circulaires de Particules (Presses Universitaires de France, 1966), ParisGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Byrd, M. Georgsson, Lifetime increase using passive harmonic cavities in synchrotron light sources. PRSTAB 4, 030701 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Y. Cai et al., Ultimate storage ring based on fourth order geometric achromats. PRSTAB 15, 054002 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. R. Chasman, G.K. Green, Preliminary design of a dedicated synchrotron radiation facility. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS22, 1765 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. J. Chavanne, G. Le Bec, Prospects for the use of permanent magnets in future accelerator facilities, in Proceedings of the IPAC14, Dresden, 2014, p. 968Google Scholar
  18. R. Dowd et al., Vertical emittance at the quantum limit, in Proceedings of the IPAC14, Dresden, 2014, p. 1096Google Scholar
  19. P. Elleaume, in Undulators, Wigglers and their Applications, ed. by H. Onuki, P. Elleaume (Taylor and Francis, London/New York, 2003), p. 79Google Scholar
  20. D. Einfeld, Synchrotron light sources, status and new projects, in Brilliant Light in Material Science, ed. by V. Tsakanov, H. Wiedeman (Springer, Dordrecht/London, 2007)Google Scholar
  21. D. Einfeld et al., Design of a diffraction limited light source, in Proceedings of the PAC95, Dallas, 1995, p. 177Google Scholar
  22. M. Eriksson et al., MAX IV design: pushing the envelope, in Proceedings of the PAC07, Albuquerque, 2007, p. 74Google Scholar
  23. ESRF upgrade programme Phase II design (2015–2022) (Orange Book), http://www.esrf.eu/ Apache_files/Upgrade/ESRF-orange-book.pdf. ESRF Dec 2014
  24. A. Fanouria, Y. Papaphilippou, Lattice design for intrabeam dominated low emittance rings presented at the 1st, in Low Emittance Ring Lattice workshop, Barcelona, April 2015. http://indico.cern.ch/event/370770/session/4/contribution/26/attachments/737616/1011999/IBS- Barcelona2015.pdf
  25. A. Franchi et al., Vertical emittance reduction and preservation in electron storage rings via resonance driving terms correction. PRSTAB 14, 034002 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. G. Geloni et al., Transverse coherence properties of X-ray beams in third generation synchrotron radiation sources. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A588, 463 (2008)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Giovannozzi et al., Prediction of long term stability in large hadron colliders. Part. Acc. 56, 195 (1997)Google Scholar
  28. S. Guiducci, Damping rings towards ultra low emittances, in Proceedings of the EPAC06, Edinburgh, 2006, p. 1857Google Scholar
  29. W. Guo, Emittance reduction approaches for the NSLS-II, in Proceedings of the IPAC12, New Orleans, 2012, p. 2363Google Scholar
  30. J. Guo, T. Raubenheimer, Low emittance e+e storage rings using bending magnets with longitudinal gradient, in EPAC02, Berkeley, 2002, p. 1136Google Scholar
  31. K. Harada et al., New injection scheme using a pulsed quadrupole magnet in electron storage rings. PRSTAB 10, 123501 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. R. Hettel et al., Lattice design for the Pep-X ultimate storage ring light source, in Proceedings of the IPAC11, San Sebastian, 2011, p. 3068Google Scholar
  33. X. Huang et al., Study of lower emittance lattices for SPEAR3, in Proceedings of the IPAC11, San Sebastian, 2011, p. 3062Google Scholar
  34. S. Khan, Simulation of the Touschek effect for Bessy-II. A Montecarlo approach, in Proceedings of the EPAC04, Lucerne, 1994, p. 1192Google Scholar
  35. K.J. Kim, Characteristics of synchrotron radiation, in AIP Conference Proceedings, N. 184 (AIP, New York, 1989), p. 565Google Scholar
  36. J. Laskar et al., The measure of chaos by the numerical analysis of fundamental frequencies. Phys. D 67, 253 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. S.Y. Lee, Emittance optimisation in three and multiple bend achromats. Phys. Rev. E 54, 1940 (1996)Google Scholar
  38. S.Y. Lee, Accelerator Physics, 2nd edn. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. S. Leemann, Beam dynamics and expected performance of Swedens new storage ring light source: MAX IV. Phys. Rev. STAB 12, 120701 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. S. Leemann, Pulsed sextupole injection for Sweden’s new light source MAX IV. Phys. Rev. STAB 15, 050705 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. S. Leemann, A. Streun, Perspectives for future light sources lattices incorporating yet uncommon magnets. Phys. Rev. STAB 14, 030701 (2011)ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. MAD – Methodical Accelerator Design, 2015 http://madx.web.cern.ch/madx/
  43. A. Nadji et al., Commissioning of the SOLEIL synchrotron radiation source, in Proceedings of the PAC07, Albuquerque, 2007, p. 932Google Scholar
  44. L. Nadolski et al., SOLEIL emittance reduction using a Robinson wiggler, in Proceedings of the IPAC12, New Orleans, 2012, p. 702Google Scholar
  45. R. Nagaoka, A. Wrulich, Emittance minimisation with longitudinal dipole field variation. NIM A575, 292 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. K. Oide, H. Koiso, Dynamic aperture of electron storage rings with non-interleaved sextupoles. Phys. Rev. E 47, 2010 (1993)Google Scholar
  47. J. Revol et al., ESRF upgrade phase II status, in Proceedings of the IPAC14, Dresden, 2014, p. 209Google Scholar
  48. D.S. Robin et al., Exploring the limits of the ALS triple bend lattice, in Proceedings of the PAC07, Albuquerque, 2007, p. 1188Google Scholar
  49. K.W. Robinson, Radiation effects in circular accelerator. Phys. Rev. 111, 373 (1958)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. M. Sands, The Physics of Electron Storage Rings: An Introduction, vol. R-121 (SLAC, Stanford, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. A. Schoch, Theory of linear and nonlinear perturbations of betatron oscillations in alternating gradient synchrotrons. CERN 57-21, 1957Google Scholar
  52. C. Steier, Lattice and emittance optimisation for the ALS lattice upgrade. NIM A649, 25 (2011)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  53. C. Steier, in Progress with the R&D towards a diffraction-limited upgrade of the ALS, in Proceedings of the IPAC15, Richmond, 2015, to appearGoogle Scholar
  54. Y. Shimosaki et al., Lattice design for a very low emittance lattice for SPring8 II, in Proceedings of the IPAC11, San Sebastian, 2012, p. 942Google Scholar
  55. A. Streun, Lattices for light sources CERN CAS 2006-02, 2006, p. 217Google Scholar
  56. A. Streun et al., Commissioning of the Swiss light source, in Proceedings of the PAC01, Chicago, 2001, p. 224Google Scholar
  57. C. Sun et al., Small emittance and low beta lattice optimisation. PRSTAB 15, 054002 (2012)Google Scholar
  58. C. Thomas et al., X-ray pinhole camera resolution and emittance measurements. PRSTAB 14, 022805 (2010)Google Scholar
  59. E. Todesco, W. Scandale, Numerical methods to estimate the dynamic aperture. Part. Acc. 54, 203 (1996)Google Scholar
  60. R. Walker, Quantum excitation and equilibrium beam properties. CERN CAS 94-01, 1995, 481Google Scholar
  61. C.X. Wang, Explicit formulae for second order driving terms due to sextupoles and chromatic effects due to quadrupoles. Technical Report LS-330, ANL/APS, 2012Google Scholar
  62. F. Willeke, Commissioning of the NSLS-II, in Proceedings of the IPAC15, Richmond, 2015, to appearGoogle Scholar
  63. A. Xiao et al., On-axis injection schemes for ultra low emittance light sources, in Proceedings of the IPAC13, Shanghai, 2013, p. 1076Google Scholar
  64. W. Yoho et al., MBA lattice proposal for the SLS, in Proceedings of the EPAC94, London, 1994, p. 627Google Scholar
  65. M. Zisman et al., ZAP’s User Manual, LBL 21270, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Diamond Light Source Ltd., Diamond HouseOxfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations