# Interdisciplinary Approaches in Mathematics Education

**DOI:**https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_82

- 4 Downloads

## Introduction

In the history of humanity, early forms of labor that provided for the satisfaction of basic needs – food, shelter, and clothing – gave rise to new, specialized forms through a progressive division of labor. Disciplines emerged – first stonemasons, farmers, and tailors and then mathematicians and mathematics teachers. Those who were highly skilled in one discipline were less so or had no skills in other disciplines. Eventually, theoretical disciplines emerged such as when some master craftsmen began to specialize in making building plans and others turned these plans into real buildings. Today, there is often very little communication between the disciplines, each of which forms a disciplinary “silo.” The idea of interdisciplinarity is to combine multiple (academic) disciplines into one activity. Whereas this may appear to be simple and straightforward, in practice it turns out that those participating in an interdisciplinary endeavor often find it difficult to work with...

## Keywords

Discipline Activity theory Object/motive Situated cognition## References

- Ehn P, Kyng M (1991) Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In: Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 169–195Google Scholar
- Husserl E (1939) Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geometrie als intentional-historisches problem. Rev Int Philos 1:203–225Google Scholar
- Marx K, Engels F (1969) Werke: Band 3. Dietz, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Nemirovsky R et al (2004) PME special issue: bodily activity and imagination in mathematics learning. Educ Stud Math 57(3):303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Orey DC, Rosa M (2012) In seeking a holistic tool for ethnomathematics: reflections on using ethnomodeling as a pedagogical action for uncovering ethnomathematical practices. In: Mukhopadhyay S, Roth W-M (eds) Alternative forms of knowing (in) mathematics. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 183–203Google Scholar
- Radford L, Edwards L, Azarello F (eds) (2009) Gestures and multimodality in the construction of mathematical meaning. Educ Stud Math 70(2):91–215Google Scholar
- Radford L, Schubring G, Seeger F (eds) (2011) Signifying and meaning-making in mathematics thinking, teaching and learning: semiotic perspectives. Educ Stud Math 77(2–3):149–397Google Scholar
- Roth W-M (1993) Problem-centered learning or the integration of mathematics and science in a constructivist laboratory: a case study. School Sci Math 93:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roth W-M (2011) Mathematics in the everyday world and at work: prolegomena for rethinking the concept of interdisciplinarity. In: Sriraman B, Freiman V (eds) Interdisciplinarity for the 21st century. Information Age, Charlotte, pp 67–108Google Scholar
- Roth W-M, Lee YJ (2007) “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: cultural-historical activity theory. Rev Educ Res 77:186–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sriraman B, Freiman V (2011) Interdisciplinarity for the twenty-first century. Information Age, CharlotteGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky LS (1989) Concrete human psychology. Sov Psychol 27(2):53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitacre I, Hohensee C, Nemirovksy R (2009) Expressiveness and mathematics learning. In: Roth W-M (ed) Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture. Information Age, Charlotte, pp 275–308Google Scholar
- Williams J, Roth W-M, Swanson D, Doig B, Groves S, Omuvwie M, Borromeo Ferri R, Mousoulides N (2016) Interdisciplinary mathematics education: a state of the art (ICME-13 topical surveys). Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar